Article Gold Open Access 2024

An intervention to improve social and emotional learning among students at risk of social exclusion; Una intervención para mejorar el aprendizaje social y emocional del alumnado en riesgo de exclusión social

Educacion XX1
Journal · Vol. 27 · Issue 1 · pp. 303-322
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of Itinerario+ program, an intervention aimed at improving the different areas of competence of the social and emotional learning model (i.e., self-awareness, social awareness, self-management, relationship skills and responsible decision-making) among students of Basic Vocational Education and Training from disadvantaged contexts. The sample was composed by 140 first year students (70 experimental group y 70 control group) from four different Basic Vocational Education and Training programs taught in five educational centers in the southern district of the city of Madrid (Spain). Social and emotional learning was assessed by the Social and Emotional Learning Scale. After assigning students to either the experimental or control group according to quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group, it was confirmed that both groups were equivalent around the control variables or covariates and Itinerario+ program was implemented. This intervention was integrated with school instruction, so the curriculum was developed in six transversal projects, including other activities (i.e., peer mentoring, individualized tutoring, vocational and professional guidance, internships in a professional environment), which were carried out by a team of previously trained teachers and educators. The results after comparing the experimental and control groups yield statistically significant differences in favor of the experimental group in social and emotional learning. These results confirm the effectiveness of the program to improve the social and emotional learning of students at risk of social exclusion, so it can be stated that Itinerario+ is an example of evidence-based practice. © 2024, Univ Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED). All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Program evaluation social and emotional learning evidence-based practice emotional developmeemotional intelligence social development

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Universidad de Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain
Funding & Acknowledgements
Grant: CNT4547
Este trabajo ha sido financiado por Porticus y la Fundación Tomillo, a través del contrato de I+D+i denominado «Evaluación del Modelo Educativo Itinerario+ – Fase I», establecido entre la Oficina de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación (OTRI) de la Universidad de Granada y la Fundación Tomillo (Referencia: CNT4547).
References 10 References
1 Ato García, Manuel, A classification system for research designs in psychology, Anales de Psicologia, 29, 3, pp. 1038-1059, (2013)
2 Choi, Álvaro, Determinants of the risk of school failure in Spain in PISA-2009 and proposals for reform, Revista de Educacion, 362, pp. 562-593, (2013)
3 Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, (2002)
4 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, (1988)
5 What is the Casel Framework Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning, (2021)
6 Corcoran, Roisin P., Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research, Educational Research Review, 25, pp. 56-72, (2018)
7 Social and Emotional Education an International Analysis, (2008)
8 Durlak, Joseph A., A Meta-Analysis of After-School Programs That Seek to Promote Personal and Social Skills in Children and Adolescents, American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 3-4, pp. 294-309, (2010)
9 Durlak, Joseph A., The Impact of Enhancing Students' Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions, Child Development, 82, 1, pp. 405-432, (2011)
10 Aprendizaje Servicio Los Retos De La Evaluacion Service Learning the Challenges of Evaluation, (2019)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
3
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers