Book chapter Gold Open Access 2024

Integrating key concepts in workplace-based assessment: Entrustable professional activities, programmatic assessment, and milestones

Entrustable Professional Activities and Entrustment Decision-Making in Health Professions Education
Journal · pp. 65-74
Abstract

Despite their independent origins, entrustable professional activities, Milestones, and programmatic assessment are interconnected concepts within the domain of competencybased education. While some organizations prioritize the use of entrustable professional activities, others prefer using Milestones. Simultaneously, competency-based education in health professions has embraced programmatic assessment as a core concept. A question raised regularly is how the three relate and whether they can be used in combination when designing an assessment system. This chapter aims to offer definitions of the three concepts and explore their mutual reinforcement, benefiting the quality of health professions education and, ultimately, patient care. To facilitate health professions trainees' progression along their educational path and enhance their autonomy through entrustment with specific clinical tasks, every curriculum needs a program of assessment. This chapter illustrates the alignment of the three concepts and provides practical examples on how they come together in a program of assessment. In summary, the seemingly distinct concepts share more common ground than previously acknowledged. By integrating the concepts, growth in context-dependent performance from novice to expert levels can be fostered, all while promoting learning in conjunction with high-stakes entrustment decision-making. © the authors 2024.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Faculteit Diergeneeskunde, Utrecht, Netherlands
Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 ten Cate, Olle Th J., Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training, Medical Education, 39, 12, pp. 1176-1177, (2005)
2 Van Der Vleuten, Cees P.M., Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes, Medical Education, 39, 3, pp. 309-317, (2005)
3 Van Der Vleuten, Cees P.M., A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose, Medical Teacher, 34, 3, pp. 205-214, (2012)
4 Skills for the New Millennium Report of the Societal Needs Working Group, (1996)
5 Batalden, Paul B., General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education, Health Affairs, 21, 5, pp. 103-111, (2002)
6 ten Cate, Olle Th J., Competency-based medical education and its competency frameworks, Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 23, pp. 903-929, (2017)
7 Practical Guide to the Evaluation of Clinical Competence, (2008)
8 Norcini, John J., Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31, Medical Teacher, 29, 9-10, pp. 855-871, (2007)
9 van Melle, Elaine, A Core Components Framework for Evaluating Implementation of Competency-Based Medical Education Programs, Academic Medicine, 94, 7, pp. 1002-1009, (2019)
10 Torre, Dario M., Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment–2. Implementation and practice, Medical Teacher, 43, 10, pp. 1149-1160, (2021)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers