Review Gold Open Access 2026

Critical thinking in biology higher education: A systematic literature review of theoretical and instructional framework

Multidisciplinary Reviews
Journal · Vol. 9 · Issue 3 · Art. e2026146
Abstract

This study aims to identify research trends in critical thinking skill frameworks and instructional designs that contribute to enhancing the critical thinking abilities of biology students in higher education. This systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA (2020) guidelines, incorporating bibliometric analysis to explore the application of critical thinking skills in biology programs in higher education. The PICOS strategy framework was employed to assess the eligibility of systematically identified articles from the Scopus database. The results Bibliometric analysis via Biblioshiny software revealed that out of 199 identified articles, 11 met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. The key findings reaffirm that critical thinking skills are an essential component of biology education. However, there is variation in definitions and approaches depending on the framework adopted in each study. These findings suggest that while there is no universally standardized conceptualization of critical thinking skills in biology education, they remain an integral part of higher-order cognitive abilities. Overall, innovative learning models such as inquiry-based learning (IBL), problem-based Learning (PBL), and the reading, questioning, and answering (RQA) model, along with the integration of digital technologies such as digital mind mapping and localized instructional videos demonstrate significant contributions to enhancing critical thinking skills. © 2026, Malque Publishing. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

higher-order cognitive skills instructional design models science education research trends

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Biology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Grant: 01653/J5.2.3, /BPI.06/9/2022, 202209092126
This research was funded by the Center for Higher Education Funding and Assessment (PPAPT) under the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Technology of Republic Indonesia, and by the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) Number 01653/J5.2.3./BPI.06/9/2022; BPI Id: 202209092126.
References 10 References
1 Abildinova, Gulmira, Preparing educators for the digital age: teacher perceptions of active teaching methods and digital integration, Frontiers in Education, 9, (2024)
2 International Journal of Secondary Education, (2016)
3 Aidoo, Benjamin, Teacher Educators Experience Adopting Problem-Based Learning in Science Education, Education Sciences, 13, 11, (2023)
4 Aktoprak, Ayten, A BIBLIOMETRIC AND CONTENT ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL THINKING IN PRIMARY EDUCATION, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, (2022)
5 Alotaibi, Sultan Khalaf G., The role of Islamic education teachers in enhancing higher-order thinking: a systematic review, British Journal of Religious Education, 47, 3, pp. 400-409, (2025)
6 Amin, Astuti Muh, The correlation between metacognitive skills and critical thinking skills at the implementation of four different learning strategies in animal physiology lectures, European Journal of Educational Research, 9, 1, pp. 143-163, (2020)
7 Andreucci-Annunziata, Paola M., Conceptualizations and instructional strategies on critical thinking in higher education: A systematic review of systematic reviews, Frontiers in Education, 8, (2023)
8 Anwar, Yenny, Measuring biology educations students' critical thinking skill using online systems, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480, 1, (2020)
9 Arsih, Fitri, Critical thinking skills of prospective biology teachers: A preliminary analysis, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215, (2020)
10 Arsyad, M., Construction of structural correlation of quantitative literacy and critical thinking, and factors affecting them in students of pre-service biology teachers, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19, 10, pp. 1-15, (2023)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers