Review Gold Open Access 2024

Application effect of BOPPPS teaching model on fundamentals of nursing education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Frontiers in Medicine
Journal · Vol. 11 · Art. 1319711
Abstract

Background: BOPPPS (bridge-in, learning objective, pretest, participatory learning, posttest, and summary) is a student-centered, closed-loop teaching model that emphasizes real-time communication and feedback. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to review and evaluate the effect of BOPPPS teaching model in “Fundamentals of Nursing” teaching. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the BOPPPS teaching model in “Fundamentals of Nursing” teaching. To review domestic and foreign databases for the period 2010 to September 2023. Finally, 13 RCTs were included and the teaching outcomes were measured and analyzed. Two researchers independently identified, selected, and extracted data from the study and examined the risk of bias. The primary outcomes were students’ examination scores (theoretical scores: scores obtained in the nursing fundamentals course, reflecting students’ understanding and mastery of the course content; practical scores: assessment results based on practical application or experimental skills, evaluating students’ practical skill level). The secondary outcomes were self-learning ability score: indicators assessing students’ self-directed learning ability, reflecting their competence in independent learning and autonomous exploration; and satisfaction rate of teaching effect: the overall satisfaction rate of students with the teaching effects experienced during teaching process reflects the proportion of students’ acceptance and satisfaction with the teaching program. The results were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) profiler software. The GRADE profiler software is used to assess and grade the recommendations according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Assessment) criteria. Results: A total of 13 studies were included, consisting of 2,991 nursing students. Among them, 1,465 students were in the BOPPPS teaching group, while 1,526 students were in the traditional teaching group. The summary analysis of the main outcomes showed that the BOPPPS teaching model had significantly higher scores in theoretical score (MD = 3.35, 95% CI: 2.35–4.35, Z = 6.56, p < 0.00001), practice score (MD = 4.50, 95% CI: 1.95–7.05, Z = 3.45, p = 0.0006), and self-learning ability score (MD = 6.76, 95% CI: 5.38–8.14, Z = 9.60, p < 0.00001) compared to the traditional teaching group. The satisfaction rate of students in the BOPPPS teaching group regarding teaching effectiveness was 89% (95% CI = 0.84–0.93). The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The GRADE evidence level for theoretical score and satisfaction rate of teaching effect is low. The evidence level for practice score is very low, and for self-learning ability score is moderate. Conclusion: The BOPPPS teaching mode is helpful to improve the theoretical score, practice score, and self-learning ability score of “Fundamentals of Nursing,” and improve the satisfaction rate of students to the teaching effect. The teaching effect is better than the traditional teaching method. © © 2024 Li, Li, Liu and Li.

Keywords

Author Keywords

meta-analysis Teaching model BOPPPS (bridge-in) GRADE quality evaluation ‘‘Fundamentals of Nursing’’ education

Index Keywords

Teaching human nursing student nursing education review satisfaction randomized controlled trial (topic) nursing competence software Self-directed learning course content GRADE approach meta analysis (topic)
Author Affiliations
Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Terry Valiga, Theresa M., Nursing Education Trends. Future Implications and Predictions, Nursing Clinics of North America, 47, 4, pp. 423-434, (2012)
2 J Nurs, (2023)
3 Health Vocat Educ, (2023)
4 China Medical Education Technology, (2021)
5 Health Vocat Educ, (2023)
6 Health Vocat Educ, (2023)
7 Fong, Jie Ming Nigel, Effective online large-group teaching in health professions education, Korean Journal of Medical Education, 34, 2, pp. 155-166, (2022)
8 Hew, Khe Foon Timothy, Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis, BMC Medical Education, 18, 1, (2018)
9 Hawkins, Nichola, Exploring why medical students still feel underprepared for clinical practice: a qualitative analysis of an authentic on‐call simulation, BMC Medical Education, 21, 1, (2021)
10 Yu, Jihye, Changes in Medical Students’ Self-Assessments of Clinical Communication Skills after Clinical Practice and Standardized Patient Feedback, Academic Psychiatry, 44, 3, pp. 272-276, (2020)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
19
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers