Article 2026

Mediation mechanisms in the hierarchical evolution of high-order thinking skills: A longitudinal study in Chinese science education

Thinking Skills and Creativity
Journal · Vol. 59 · Art. 101996
Abstract

This study investigated the mediation mechanisms underlying the internal evolution of high-order thinking skills (HOTSs) among 132 seventh-grade students in China, focusing on the hierarchical relationships between specific HOTSs (S-HOTSs: evidence-based reasoning, model construction, systematic thinking and critical discussion skills) and complex HOTSs (C-HOTSs: critical-thinking and problem-solving skills). Using a longitudinal design with formative and summative assessments, the study employed single and chain mediation models to analyze HOTSs development during a 9-session biological science course on photosynthesis, respiration and the food chain. The results revealed that S-HOTS indirectly promote C–HOTS through sequential mediation pathways, with stronger effects from chain mediators compared to direct effects. Notably, model construction and systematic thinking skills emerged as pivotal mediators, bridging early-developing HOTSs and later-developing HOTSs. These findings highlighted the importance of stepwise instructional strategies aligned with hierarchical skill evolution, offering empirical insights for designing curricula that foster the development of HOTSs in science education. © 2025 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

Author Keywords

Evolution Hierarchical structure High-order thinking skill Mediation mechanisms

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Brain and Learning Science, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, National Experimental Base of Intelligent Society Governance (Education), Nanjing, China, Institute of Child Development and Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Funding & Acknowledgements
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Grant: 2242024S30006
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central universities (2242024S30006), China.
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central universities (2242024S30006), China.
References 10 References
1 Al-Busaidi, Saleh, Project-based learning as a tool for student-teachers’ professional development: A study in an Omani EFL teacher education program, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20, 4, pp. 116-136, (2021)
2 Does Deeper Learning Improve Student Outcomes, (2014)
3 Bai, Yongxiao, An Assessment of Eighth Graders’ Mathematics Higher Order Thinking Skills in the Chinese Context, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 23, 2, pp. 365-382, (2023)
4 Bao, Lei, Knowledge integration in student learning of Newton's third law: Addressing the action-reaction language and the implied causality, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, 2, (2021)
5 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, (1956)
6 Bramwell-Lalor, Sharon, The Effects of Using Concept Mapping for Improving Advanced Level Biology Students' Lower- and Higher-Order Cognitive Skills, International Journal of Science Education, 36, 5, pp. 839-864, (2014)
7 Buckley, Jeffrey, Investigating the use of spatial reasoning strategies in geometric problem solving, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 2, pp. 341-362, (2019)
8 Campos e Lopes, Aldo Peres E., Critical consciousness in engineering education: going beyond critical thinking in mathematical modeling, European Journal of Engineering Education, 48, 6, pp. 991-1014, (2023)
9 Chen, Ken Zen, Novice young board-game players’ experience about computational thinking, Interactive Learning Environments, (2020)
10 Chittleborough, Gail D., The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 3, pp. 274-292, (2007)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers