Book chapter Gold Open Access 2024

The Multi-tiered Support and Empowerment of Youth At-Risk of Social Exclusion in VET in Norway

Empowering At-Risk Youth in and Through Vocational Education: A Comparative View of the Baltic Countries and Norway
Journal · pp. 23-51
Abstract

In this chapter we first introduce the Norwegian concept and model for supporting the social inclusion of VET students at-risk of social exclusion with respect to combating school dropout and the promotion of transitions between various learning contexts, such as school and work, and discuss in the light of available studies, how the model works when applying the inclusion principle in practice. We explain the Norwegian definition of dropout, the support system available for the successful completion of VET. Furthermore, we describe the basis, the basics, and prospects of inclusion as a concept and principle in education, and then take a critical look at its implementation in practice with special regard to vulnerable students in VET. The second part of the chapter is based on findings from empirical studies in Norway during the EmpowerVET project.Based on individual qualitative interviews, we first describe how these students themselves experience and voice their opportunities, prospects, and limitations in the context of VET. Thereafter, we describe how two exemplary schools work in practice to support these students through their interpretation and implementation of the Norwegian principle and model for inclusion, “the best for the pupil/students” (The Education Act). In the final section of this chapter, we draw some conclusions based on the analysis and discuss the model and its implementation. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2025. This book is an open access publication.

Keywords

Author Keywords

inclusion Diversity school dropout Educational partnerships Multi-professional, collaboration

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Universitetet i Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Report from an Expert Group, (2021)
2 Biesta, Gert J.J., Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 1, pp. 33-46, (2009)
3 Universitetsforlaget, (1999)
4 Oslo Frischsenteret, (2010)
5 Bruin, Marieke, Alternative courses in upper secondary vocational education and training: Students' narratives on hopes and failures, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17, 10, pp. 1089-1105, (2013)
6 Bruin, Marieke, Participation and learning in Vocational education and training - a cross-national analysis of the perspectives of youth at risk for social exclusion, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 77, 3, pp. 706-727, (2025)
7 Statistics Norway, (2024)
8 Edvardsen, Sissel Elisabeth, I never asked to quit school myself” . A qualitative study of a group of girls’ path to drop out of upper secondary school, Norsk Epidemiologi, 28, 1-2, pp. 69-77, (2019)
9 Guidance System in Norway, (2022)
10 Education and Training Monitor 2022, (2022)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers