Article Gold Open Access 2023

Digital measurement of hands-on performance? Ecological validation of a computer-based assessment of automotive repair skills

Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 15 · Issue 1 · Art. 15
Abstract

We investigated the ecological validity of performance measures from a computer-based assessment tool that utilises scripted video vignettes. The intended purpose of this tool is to assess the maintenance and repair skills of automotive technician apprentices, complementing traditional hands-on assessment formats from the German journeymen’s exams. We hypothesise that the ability to correctly judge repair actions shown in videos is a good predictor of the ability to perform corresponding actions in hands-on scenarios. Apprentices in the third year of vocational training carried out repairs on real cars or car systems, while experts rated their performance. After this, they worked on our computer-based tests, which utilise videos of very similar repairs. The correlation between video judgement and hands-on performance was lower than expected for most repair actions as well as for overall scores, indicating insufficient ecological validity of the test score interpretations. However, the findings are promising for developing future tests, as the results for some repair actions indicate it is generally possible to develop ecologically valid video-based items focusing on hands-on skills. We discuss the results in the light of a validation framework that combines validity evidence from different sources for the same assessment tool. Finally, we hope our findings contribute to a broader discussion about the psychometric quality of exams. © 2023, The Author(s).

Keywords

Author Keywords

VET ecological validity Authentic assessment Validation Hands-on skills

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Abteilung Technik und ihre Didaktik, Pädagogische Hochschule Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF
Grant: 21AP004A
This study is part of project DigiDIn-Kfz of the research initiative ASCOT + , funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Grant no. 21AP004A. The funding body did in no way interfere with the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or the writing of the manuscript.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF
This study is part of project DigiDIn-Kfz of the research initiative ASCOT + , funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Grant no. 21AP004A. The funding body did in no way interfere with the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or the writing of the manuscript.
References 10 References
1 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, (1985)
2 Automated Scoring of Complex Tasks in Computer Based Testing, (2006)
3 Bennett, Randy Elliot, Inexorable and inevitable: The continuing story of technology and assessment, Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1, 1, pp. 1-24, (2002)
4 Bennett, Randy Elliot, Does it matter if I take my mathematics test on computer? A second empirical study of mode effects in NAEP, Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6, 9, pp. 1-39, (2008)
5 Clariana, Roy B., Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode effect, British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 5, pp. 593-602, (2002)
6 Research in Learning Technology, (2005)
7 Cook, David Allan, Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: A systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality, Academic Medicine, 88, 6, pp. 872-883, (2013)
8 Wirtschaftspolitische Positionen Der Ihk Organisation 2021 Economic Policy Positions of the Ihk Organisation, (2021)
9 Earli 2023 Book of Abstracts, (2023)
10 Gafni, Naomi, Comments on implementing validity theory, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 23, 2, pp. 284-286, (2016)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers