Article 2023

Dynamics between universities and social entrepreneurs: Insights from a multi-country project in Latin America

Business and Society Review
Journal · Vol. 128 · Issue 4 · pp. 710-733
Abstract

Research has stressed the importance of universities in developing entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) and their possible social and economic impacts on society. Concerning this commitment, social entrepreneurs (SEs) favor university actions that facilitate the improvement of their individual capital. However, research on this topic has received little attention. This study investigated how universities contribute to the advancement of EEs. It also examines the mechanisms that universities employ to support SEs. Two survey instruments were administered: one to 418 SEs, and the other to 494 people affiliated with universities. The results indicate that universities can be key actors in EEs because they can mobilize resources aligned with their institutional commitments, including training, facilities, and contact with several stakeholders. Additionally, SEs rely on training opportunities and connections with other stakeholders to implement entrepreneurial initiatives. Accordingly, our study highlights the critical role universities play in the development and survival of SEs. © 2023 W. Michael Hoffman Center for Business Ethics at Bentley University.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Latin America Universities Institutional support Social entrepreneurship entrepreneurial ecosystems

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BRU, Belgium
Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral Ecuador, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador
Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral Ecuador, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador, Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral Ecuador, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador
Funding & Acknowledgements
European Commission, EC
Grant: 617788‐EPP‐1‐2020‐1‐BE‐EPPKA2‐CBHE‐JP
Funding text 1: This study is part of the joint project European and Latin American Network in Support of Social Entrepreneurs (ELANET), co‐founded by the ERASMUS+ Program of the European Union. The ELANET project was led by the Chair of Social Entrepreneurship at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium, where 34 universities and partner organizations participated. The objective of ELANET is to assess the needs of SEs and enhance the capabilities that HEIs require to support SEs.; Funding text 2: This work was supported by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union [Grant No. 617788‐EPP‐1‐2020‐1‐BE‐EPPKA2‐CBHE‐JP].
European Commission, EC
Funding text 1: This study is part of the joint project European and Latin American Network in Support of Social Entrepreneurs (ELANET), co‐founded by the ERASMUS+ Program of the European Union. The ELANET project was led by the Chair of Social Entrepreneurship at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium, where 34 universities and partner organizations participated. The objective of ELANET is to assess the needs of SEs and enhance the capabilities that HEIs require to support SEs.; Funding text 2: This work was supported by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union [Grant No. 617788‐EPP‐1‐2020‐1‐BE‐EPPKA2‐CBHE‐JP].
Erasmus+
Funding text 1: This study is part of the joint project European and Latin American Network in Support of Social Entrepreneurs (ELANET), co‐founded by the ERASMUS+ Program of the European Union. The ELANET project was led by the Chair of Social Entrepreneurship at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium, where 34 universities and partner organizations participated. The objective of ELANET is to assess the needs of SEs and enhance the capabilities that HEIs require to support SEs.; Funding text 2: This work was supported by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union [Grant No. 617788‐EPP‐1‐2020‐1‐BE‐EPPKA2‐CBHE‐JP].
References 10 References
1 Agarwal, Sucheta, A qualitative approach towards crucial factors for sustainable development of women social entrepreneurship: Indian cases, Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, (2020)
2 Aguinis, Herman, Conducting Management Research in Latin America: Why and What’s in It for You?, Journal of Management, 46, 5, pp. 615-636, (2020)
3 Anshika, Financial literacy of entrepreneurs: a systematic review, Managerial Finance, 48, 9-10, pp. 1352-1371, (2022)
4 Austin, James E., Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30, 1, pp. 1-22, (2006)
5 Barki, Edgard, Support for social entrepreneurs from disadvantaged areas navigating crisis: Insights from Brazil, Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, (2020)
6 Beck, Thorsten, Access to Finance: An unfinished agenda, World Bank Economic Review, 22, 3, pp. 383-396, (2008)
7 Translating Questionnaires and Other Research Instruments Problems and Solutions, (2000)
8 Bergman, Brian J., Entrepreneurs in the making: Six decisions for fostering entrepreneurship through maker spaces, Business Horizons, 63, 6, pp. 811-824, (2020)
9 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, (2019)
10 Bouncken, Ricarda B., Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship, Review of Managerial Science, 12, 1, pp. 317-334, (2018)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers