Article 2023

Performance measurement model for technical universities – case study

International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management
Journal · Vol. 40 · Issue 10 · pp. 2632-2663
Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this paper is twofold: to present a proposal for a model of educational quality management system within a process approach context for technical universities, and a conceptual model of a performance measurement system (PMS) towards the assessment of the quality level of management, core and support processes. Design/methodology/approach: The paper encompasses two main parts: a theoretical portion and a case study. Within the theoretical background, the authors discuss the issue of educational quality management supported on a process approach perspective as well as performance measurement system in high education (HE). The case study reports the development of the concept of performance measurement system for technical universities. Findings: The proposed system of educational quality management supported on a process approach, together with a conceptual model of the performance measurement system, can be implemented in every technical university. The identification of processes in the education quality management system permitted the development of the PMS. The model covers 32 key performance indicators (KPIs) for management processes, 39 for core processes and 19 for supporting ones. Research limitations/implications: The proposed performance measurement system is limited in its focus on educational processes and support of these processes. The evaluation of scientific and research activity and aspects related to financial resources is not pursued. Originality/value: Elaboration of a conceptual model of a performance measurement system towards the assessment of the quality level of management, core and support processes is dedicated to technical universities. © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

key performance indicators Educational quality management system Performance measurement system Process approach

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Management and Production Engineering, Opole University of Technology, Opole, OP, Poland
Department of Production and Systems, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Braga, Portugal
Funding & Acknowledgements
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, FCT
Grant: UIDB/00319/2020
This work was supported by National Funds through FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) within the R&D Units Project Scope: UIDB/00319/2020.
References 10 References
1 Abubakar, Ahmed, New Tools for Measuring Global Academic Performance, SAGE Open, 8, 3, (2018)
2 Reza El Akbar, R., Differentiation and Exploration of Model MACP for HE VER 1.0 on Prototype Performance Measurement Application for Higher Education, E3S Web of Conferences, 31, (2018)
3 Al Jardali, Hussein, Performance management systems in Lebanese private higher education institutions: design and implementation challenges, Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 11, 2, pp. 297-316, (2021)
4 Alach, Zhivan J., Performance measurement and accountability in higher education: the puzzle of qualification completions, Tertiary Education and Management, 22, 1, pp. 36-48, (2016)
5 Alach, Zhivan J., The use of performance measurement in universities, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30, 2, pp. 102-117, (2017)
6 Almohtasb, Ahmad Ali, A roadmap for developing, implementing and evaluating performance management systems in Jordan public universities, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11, 2, pp. 325-339, (2019)
7 Angiola, Nunzio, Performance management in public universities: overcoming bureaucracy, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67, 4, pp. 736-753, (2018)
8 Athiyaman, Adee, Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions: the case of university education, European Journal of Marketing, 31, 7, pp. 528-540, (1997)
9 Barnabè, Federico, WHICH ROLE FOR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS IN HIGHER EDUCATION? FOCUS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ITALY, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 3-4, pp. 302-319, (2007)
10 Bisbe, Josep, Using strategic performance measurement systems for strategy formulation: Does it work in dynamic environments?, Management Accounting Research, 23, 4, pp. 296-311, (2012)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
3
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers