Article Gold Open Access 2023

The collective voice of unions and workplace training in Italy: New insights from mixed methods

British Journal of Industrial Relations
Journal · Vol. 61 · Issue 3 · pp. 595-622
Abstract

Using a three-phase approach that combines quantitative (pooled OLS, fixed effects and IV) with qualitative (semi-structured interviews) analyses, we find that in Italy, workplace unions are more likely to enhance training when they sign a firm-level agreement and when they can get access to external funds for financing. We also identify three channels: what we call a ‘maturation effect’, double-track communication and watch-dog function. We argue that these results are consistent with the idea that the impact of workplace unions on training depends on the empowerment of its collective voice within an institutional framework that does not fit either of the standard models provided by collective and liberal market economies. © 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Industrial Relations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, TO, Italy
Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, VR, Italy
Istituto Nazionale per l’Analisi delle Politiche Pubbliche, Rome, RM, Italy
Funding & Acknowledgements
Università degli Studi di Torino, UNITO
Funding text 1: We thank Mirella Damiani and Christine Trampusch and the participants to the workshop on ‘ (University of Torino), to the conference on ‘ (University of Roma ‘Roma Tre’), the SISEC Conference (Catholic University of Milan and University of Brescia), the Conference in Memory of Marco Biagi (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia), the Workshop on Labor Economics (University of Trier), the SASE Conference (Doshisha University, Kyoto) and to the seminars held at LISER (Esch‐sur‐Alzette) and at the Department of Economics and Statistics of the University of Torino for helpful comments and suggestions. The University of Torino and Compagnia di San Paolo Bank Foundation with projects ‘ and ‘ are kindly acknowledged for financial support. We also thank the National Institute for Public Policy Analysis INAPP for data support. The opinions expressed here reflect only the authors’ views and not their institutions’. The INAPP is not responsible for any use that can be made of the present results. The article results from an equal effort by all its authors, to whom it should be attributed evenly. The other usual disclaimers apply. Skill mismatch: measurement issues and consequences for innovative and inclusive societies’ Reassessment and Perspectives of Labor Policies’ Skill mismatch: measurement issues and consequences for innovative and inclusive societies’ Productivity, welfare and decentralization’; Funding text 2: We thank Mirella Damiani and Christine Trampusch and the participants to the workshop on ‘Skill mismatch: measurement issues and consequences for innovative and inclusive societies’ (University of Torino), to the conference on ‘Reassessment and Perspectives of Labor Policies’ (University of Roma ‘Roma Tre’), the SISEC Conference (Catholic University of Milan and University of Brescia), the Conference in Memory of Marco Biagi (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia), the Workshop on Labor Economics (University of Trier), the SASE Conference (Doshisha University, Kyoto) and to the seminars held at LISER (Esch-sur-Alzette) and at the Department of Economics and Statistics of the University of Torino for helpful comments and suggestions. The University of Torino and Compagnia di San Paolo Bank Foundation with projects ‘Skill mismatch: measurement issues and consequences for innovative and inclusive societies’ and ‘Productivity, welfare and decentralization’ are kindly acknowledged for financial support. We also thank the National Institute for Public Policy Analysis INAPP for data support. The opinions expressed here reflect only the authors’ views and not their institutions’. The INAPP is not responsible for any use that can be made of the present results. The article results from an equal effort by all its authors, to whom it should be attributed evenly. The other usual disclaimers apply.
References 10 References
1 Acemoglu, Daron, Why do firms train? theory and evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1, pp. 78-119, (1998)
2 La Contrattazione Collettiva in Italia 20122014, (2015)
3 Journal of Labor Market Research Zeitschrift Fur Arbeitsmarktforschung, (2007)
4 Addison, John T., Works councils in Germany: Their effects on establisment perfomance, Oxford Economic Papers, 53, 4, pp. 659-694, (2001)
5 Allaart, Piet, Company-provided further training in Germany and the Netherlands, Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1, 2, pp. 103-121, (2009)
6 Socio Economic Review, (2004)
7 Amable, Bruno, The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, pp. 1-324, (2005)
8 Lee Ashcraft, Karen, Self-direction or social support? Nonprofit empowerment and the tacit employment contract of organizational communication studies, Communication Monographs, 69, 1, pp. 88-110, (2002)
9 Backes-Gellner, Uschi, Codetermination and personnel policies of German firms: The influence of works councils on turnover and further training, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8, 3, pp. 328-347, (1997)
10 Impact of the Ulr A Survey of Ulrs and their Employers, (2009)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
4
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers