Review Gold Open Access 2025

The global progress for improving diagnosis: what we've learned, what comes next

Diagnosis
Journal · Vol. 12 · Issue 4 · pp. 529-537
Abstract

Since the 2015 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, global awareness of diagnostic safety has grown substantially. Progress has been most visible in high-income countries, with emerging international research networks, conferences, and educational programs. Australia and New Zealand have advanced incident reporting systems, specialty-specific diagnostic safety tools, and educational resources. European initiatives have expanded research on clinical reasoning, bias, and safety-netting, developed competency-based curricula, and investigated digital innovations including decision support systems. Japan has built on a strong tradition of clinical reasoning mastery, advancing theoretical frameworks, cultural analysis, and AI-based diagnostic support, and hosting major regional conferences. Despite these gains, engagement remains uneven, with limited data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Barriers include resource constraints, underdeveloped infrastructure, and differing disease burdens that challenge the transferability of AI and other innovations. Future progress requires clear, measurable objectives across five domains: research, education, practice improvement, patient engagement, and policy. Recommendations include establishing national diagnostic error databases, promoting multicenter research in underrepresented settings, expanding standardized curricula, implementing structured audit-and-feedback systems, integrating patient perspectives, and embedding diagnostic safety indicators in policy and reimbursement frameworks. International collaboration, context-sensitive methodologies, and robust governance for emerging technologies are critical to ensure equitable improvements. By leveraging shared learning, strengthening capacity in LMICs, and aligning efforts with global policy frameworks, the diagnostic safety movement can evolve from fragmented initiatives to a cohesive, sustainable worldwide strategy, aiming for safer, more reliable diagnosis by 2035. © 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

Keywords

Author Keywords

diagnostic error diagnostic excellence improving diagnosis

Index Keywords

human awareness Collaborative learning diagnosis Germany review conceptual framework clinical audit clinical reasoning diagnostic error Australia and New Zealand cultural anthropology decision support system high income country Japan middle income country patient engagement reimbursement
Author Affiliations
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga District, Tochigi, Japan
Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Bern, BE, Switzerland
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, (2015)
2 undefined
3 Scott, Ian A., Diagnostic error: incidence, impacts, causes and preventive strategies, Medical Journal of Australia, 213, 7, pp. 302-305.e2, (2020)
4 Scott, Ian A., Too much versus too little: looking for the “sweet spot” in optimal use of diagnostic investigations, Medical Journal of Australia, 220, 2, pp. 67-70, (2024)
5 Scott, Ian A., Using conversant artificial intelligence to improve diagnostic reasoning: ready for prime time?, Medical Journal of Australia, 221, 5, pp. 240-243, (2024)
6 Scott, Ian A., Developing critical thinking skills for delivering optimal care, Internal Medicine Journal, 51, 4, pp. 488-493, (2021)
7 Dahm, Maria R., ‘More than words’ – Interpersonal communication, cognitive bias and diagnostic errors, Patient Education and Counseling, 105, 1, pp. 252-256, (2022)
8 Yip, Harry, Diagnostic error in an ophthalmic emergency department, Diagnosis, 7, 2, pp. 129-131, (2020)
9 Crock, Carmel T., Error and safety in Emergency Medicine, EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, 31, 4, pp. 662-664, (2019)
10 Hansen, Kim, The Emergency Medicine Events Register: An analysis of the first 150 incidents entered into a novel, online incident reporting registry, EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, 28, 5, pp. 544-550, (2016)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers