The inverse U-shaped relationship between challenge stressors and workplace learning outcomes: a study of young employees in Japan

Abstract

Purpose: In recent years, scholars have questioned the linear relationship between challenge stressors and positive outcomes. Nevertheless, few studies have examined whether challenge stressors and workplace learning outcomes have an inverse U-shaped relationship. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether challenge stressors have an inverse U-shaped relationship with workplace learning outcomes among young Japanese employees. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from 1,257 individuals in two time periods through an internet survey and analyzed using regression analysis. Findings: The findings suggest that challenge stressors have an inverse U-shaped relationship with workplace learning outcomes. Practical implications: The relationship between challenge stressors and workplace learning outcomes is positive until a certain point and becomes negative after a certain point. Hence, when promoting learning outcomes among young employees, supervisors should be careful to avoid subjecting employees to very little or excessive amount of challenge stressors. Originality/value: This study provides evidence supporting the assumption that the relationship between challenge stressors and positive outcomes has an inverted U-shape. © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

workplace learning Challenge stressor Challenge-hindrance model

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations

Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Funding & Acknowledgements

No funding information

References 10 References

1 Antwi, Collins Opoku, Job demand stressors and employees’ creativity: a within-person approach to dealing with hindrance and challenge stressors at the airport environment, Service Industries Journal, 39, 3-4, pp. 250-278, (2019)

2 Ashford, Susan J., Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 2, pp. 199-214, (1996)

3 Ashforth, Blake E., Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 3, pp. 447-462, (2007)

4 Teaching for Quality Learning at University, (1999)

5 LePine, Marcie A., An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1, pp. 65-74, (2000)

6 Clarke, Nicholas, Workplace learning environment and its relationship with learning outcomes in healthcare organizations, Human Resource Development International, 8, 2, pp. 185-205, (2005)

7 Cortini, Michela, Workplace identity as a mediator in the relationship between learning climate and job satisfaction during apprenticeship: Suggestions for HR practitioners, Journal of Workplace Learning, 28, 2, pp. 54-65, (2016)

8 Crawford, Eean R., Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test, Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 5, pp. 834-848, (2010)

9 Crouse, Paula, Workplace learning strategies, barriers, facilitators and outcomes: A qualitative study among human resource management practitioners, Human Resource Development International, 14, 1, pp. 39-55, (2011)

10 Ellinger, Andrea D., Contextual factors influencing informal learning in a workplace setting: The case of "reinventing itself company, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 3, pp. 389-415, (2005)

The inverse U-shaped relationship between challenge stressors and workplace learning outcomes: a study of young employees in Japan

How to Cite