Article Gold Open Access 2023

Learning chemistry through designing and its effectiveness towards inventive thinking

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Journal · Vol. 19 · Issue 12 · Art. em2374
Abstract

Learning through designing is the latest innovation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics teaching and learning in the 21st century. This study aims to identify the effectiveness of EkSTEMiT module in fostering inventive thinking in the subject of electrochemistry. EkSTEMiT module was tested through a quasi-experimental design method of nonequivalent pre- and posttests. A total of 63 students from four rural schools were involved in this study. Two schools were included in the treatment group (n=32), and two schools were included in the control group (n=31). The instrument used in this study was Inventive Thinking Questionnaire, which consists of adaptability and complexity management, self-regulation, curiosity, creativity, risk-taking, and higher-order thinking and reasoning subdomains. Analysis of MANOVA repeated measures showed no significant effect for group and time and no significant interaction effect between group and time on the level of students’ inventive thinking. Although EkSTEMiT module does not have a significant impact on the level of inventive thinking, it can have a particular impact on the teaching of innovative instructors and can subsequently increase interest in the subject of chemistry among students. © 2023 by the authors; licensee Modestum. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). All Rights Reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

electrochemistry inventive thinking learning through designing

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM
Grant: GG-2023-007
Author contributions: All authors have sufficiently contributed to the study and agreed with the results and conclusions. Funding: This work was supported by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (GG-2023-007). Ethical statement: The authors gained approval from an ethics committee (UKM.AKA.600-4/4/12(P107708)), permission from the Ministry of Education (KPM.600-3/2/3-eras(13200)), and the consent of state education department (JPNS.SPS.MTE.500-12/4) and school administration, instructors, and students. Declaration of interest: No conflict of interest is declared by authors. Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author.
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM
Author contributions: All authors have sufficiently contributed to the study and agreed with the results and conclusions. Funding: This work was supported by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (GG-2023-007). Ethical statement: The authors gained approval from an ethics committee (UKM.AKA.600-4/4/12(P107708)), permission from the Ministry of Education (KPM.600-3/2/3-eras(13200)), and the consent of state education department (JPNS.SPS.MTE.500-12/4) and school administration, instructors, and students. Declaration of interest: No conflict of interest is declared by authors. Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author.
References 10 References
1 21 St Inventive Thinking Skills in Science Among Primary Students in Malaysia and Brunei, (2011)
2 Abdullah, Maria, 21st century inventive thinking skills among primary students in Malaysia and Brunei, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, pp. 1646-1651, (2010)
3 Piaget S Constructivism Papert S Constructionism What S the Difference, (2001)
4 Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, (2018)
5 Allina, Babette, The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment, Arts Education Policy Review, 119, 2, pp. 77-87, (2018)
6 Alrawili, Khaled Saleh R., Effect of scaffolding strategies on higher-order thinking skills in science classroom, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19, 5, pp. 718-729, (2020)
7 Moktar, Azlin Mohamad, Instrument development for 21st century skills in Biology, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp. 1470-1474, (2011)
8 Besser, Avi, Adaptability to a Sudden Transition to Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Understanding the Challenges for Students, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 8, 2, pp. 85-105, (2022)
9 Bruckman, Amy S., Community Support for Constructionist Learning, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 1-2, pp. 47-86, (1998)
10 Burrows Borowczak, Andrea C., Integrated stem for teacher professional learning and development: “i need time for practice”, Education Sciences, 11, 1, pp. 1-23, (2021)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers