Article Gold Open Access 2025

Six-Sigma approach to improve industry engagement strategies in Malaysian apprenticeship program

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
Journal · Vol. 14 · Issue 5 · pp. 3565-3573
Abstract

This empirical study develops an industry engagement model (IEM) by using the Six-Sigma define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC) methodology to investigate the key strategies to enhance industry participation (IP) in the Malaysian apprenticeship program known as the National Dual Training System (NDTS). The relationship between five strategies, namely financial incentives (FI), digital administration (DA), productive collaboration (PC), flexible implementation (FT), and efficient promotion (EP) on IP, was examined. The 204 returned questionnaires were analyzed using partial least square-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). The findings reveal that FT, EP, and DA strongly influence IP in the NDTS program. In contrast, improvement in FI and PC has little impact on industry involvement. The development of IEM by demonstrating the DMAIC concept is novel and new to the research. It offers enormous potential and value in improving policymakers’ decision-making in apprenticeship programs. It may also be extended to other areas of education in the future. © 2025 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

PLS-SEM industry engagement national dual training system Apprenticeship system Six-Sigma DMAIC

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Antony, Jiju, Using Six Sigma DMAIC for Lean project management in education: a case study in a German kindergarten, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 33, 13-14, pp. 1489-1509, (2022)
2 Cudney, Elizabeth A., Systematic review of Lean and Six Sigma approaches in higher education, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 31, 3-4, pp. 231-244, (2020)
3 Chang, Mike C., Evaluation and improvement of student learning experience in the post-COVID world: A lean six-sigma DMAIC study, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 52, 3, pp. 315-335, (2024)
4 Ameen Abdulla, Mahmood S., Analytical Investigation of Higher Education Quality Improvement by Using Six Sigma Approach, HighTech and Innovation Journal, 3, 2, pp. 196-206, (2022)
5 Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development, (2022)
6 International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation, (2020)
7 Maciel-Monteon, Marco Antonio, Measuring Critical Success Factors for Six Sigma in Higher Education Institutions: Development and Validation of a Surveying Instrument, IEEE Access, 8, pp. 1813-1823, (2020)
8 Academic Journal of Applied Mathematical Sciences, (2021)
9 Davidson, Janelle Margaret, Lean Six Sigma and quality frameworks in higher education – a review of literature, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11, 6, pp. 1005-1018, (2020)
10 International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, (2020)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers