Article Gold Open Access 2023

The study of the effectiveness of design-based engineering learning: the mediating role of cognitive engagement and the moderating role of modes of engagement

Frontiers in Psychology
Journal · Vol. 14 · Art. 1151610
Abstract

Aim: Design-based engineering learning (DBEL) offers a potentially valuable approach to engineering education, but its mechanism of action has yet to be verified by empirical studies. Accordingly, the present study aimed to establish whether DBEL produces better learning outcomes, thereby building a strong, empirically grounded case for further research into engineering education. Methods: To build a more comprehensive model of design-based engineering learning, the variables of cognitive engagement (the mediator) and modes of engagement (the moderator) were introduced to build a theoretical process model. Questionnaires and multiple linear regression analysis were used to verify the model. Results and discussion: All four features of DBEL (design practice, interactive reflection, knowledge integration, and circular iteration) were found to exert significant and positive effects on learning outcomes. Moreover, cognitive engagement was found to both fully and partially mediate the relationships between these features and the outcomes of engineering learning; under two different modes of engagement, the positive effects of the learning features on cognitive engagement differed significantly. Conclusion: The paper concluded the following: (1) a design-based learning approach can enhance engineering students’ learning outcomes, (2) cognitive engagement mediates between design-based engineering learning and learning outcomes (3) a systematic mode of engagement produces better learning outcomes than a staged modes of engagement. © © 2023 Wei, Zhang and Lin.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Engineering education learning outcomes Cognitive Engagement Design-based Engineering Learning Modes of Engagement

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China, School of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China
School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, Technology and Education Policy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Funding & Acknowledgements
Grant: 2020ZD1014
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China program (72074191), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation program (LZ22G030004), and the Chinese Society of Academic Degrees and Graduate Education program (2020ZD1014).
National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC
Grant: 72074191
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China program (72074191), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation program (LZ22G030004), and the Chinese Society of Academic Degrees and Graduate Education program (2020ZD1014).
National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China program (72074191), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation program (LZ22G030004), and the Chinese Society of Academic Degrees and Graduate Education program (2020ZD1014).
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, ZJNSF
Grant: LZ22G030004
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China program (72074191), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation program (LZ22G030004), and the Chinese Society of Academic Degrees and Graduate Education program (2020ZD1014).
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, ZJNSF
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China program (72074191), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation program (LZ22G030004), and the Chinese Society of Academic Degrees and Graduate Education program (2020ZD1014).
References 10 References
1 Green Report Engineering Education for A Changing World, (1994)
2 Baron, Reuben M., The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research. Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, pp. 1173-1182, (1986)
3 World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, (2003)
4 Betts, Joseph E., A study of the factorial invariance of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students, School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 2, pp. 84-93, (2010)
5 Cossette, Louise, Émergence de la distinction personne-objet, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 31, 1, pp. 54-61, (1999)
6 U S Engineering in A Global Economy, (2017)
7 Collazos, César, Evaluating collaborative learning processes using system-based measurement, Educational Technology and Society, 10, 3, pp. 257-274, (2007)
8 undefined, (2008)
9 Made in America Regaining the Productive Edge, (1989)
10 Doppelt, Yaron, Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 1, pp. 55-65, (2009)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
9
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers