Article 2026

Does telehealth disrupt the trainee–supervisor learning environment in vocational general practice training? A qualitative study

Medical Education
Journal · Vol. 60 · Issue 2 · pp. 143-155
Abstract

Background: Used sparingly before 2020, telehealth was quickly adopted throughout Australia in response to COVID-19. This required general practitioner (GP) trainees (registrars) and their educators (supervisors and medical educators) to rapidly learn telehealth as a primary consultation method. As telehealth use continues within primary health care beyond the pandemic, greater insight into the impact on GP training is required. This is particularly relevant to general practice settings in countries that, like Australia, utilise an apprenticeship-style training model where the social space of in-consultation learning with supervisors is key to registrars achieving competence. We aimed to explore the impact of telehealth uptake on Australian GP vocational training, with particular focus on the in-consultation social space of registrars' learning. Methodology: Qualitative semi-structured individual interviews with 15 registrars, five supervisors and five medical educators were conducted and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Wenger's community of practice theory provided a conceptual framework for analysis and interpretation. Findings: Three key themes were generated. (1) The social space of learning can be disrupted by telehealth. Registrars described how telehealth changed the options for help-seeking during consultations, delaying feedback for learning. Medical educators reported concerns about the delay of what should be immediate feedback for learning during consultations, whereas registrars and supervisors held mixed views on whether such delays impacted registrar learning. (2) Reduced in-person clinical exposure creates educational challenges. Telehealth consultations resulted in a loss of experiences and skill-development opportunities and reduced diversity of clinical practice. (3) Registrars and educators were managing and learning telehealth within a pandemic context. A lack of formal telehealth training to guide best practice required registrars and educators to learn how to utilise telehealth together. Conclusions: The rapid uptake of telehealth altered the in-practice social space of registrars' learning. As telehealth use continues, these findings highlight the need for telehealth-specific training to maximise registrar learning during consultations. © 2025 Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

learning female human male Humans interview qualitative research Australia coronavirus disease 2019 education epidemiology general practice general practitioner Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 telemedicine COVID-19 General Practitioners Interviews as Topic SARS-CoV-2
Author Affiliations
School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, Australia, GP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, Australia, GP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia, School of Population Health, UNSW Medicine, Kensington, NSW, Australia
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
GP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, RACGP
Grant: ERG2022‐01
This project was supported by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Education Research Grant 2022 (ERG2022\u201001) with funding from the Australian Government under the Australian General Practice Training Program. Funding Information
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, RACGP
This project was supported by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Education Research Grant 2022 (ERG2022\u201001) with funding from the Australian Government under the Australian General Practice Training Program. Funding Information
References 10 References
1 Telehealth, (2022)
2 Bursell, Sven Erik, Evolving telehealth reimbursement in Australia, Internal Medicine Journal, 46, 8, pp. 977-981, (2016)
3 Snoswell, Centaine L., Telehealth uptake in general practice as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, Australian Health Review, 44, 5, pp. 737-740, (2020)
4 Covid 19 Temporary Mbs Telehealth Services, (2021)
5 Telehealth and Coronavirus Medicare Benefits Schedule Mbs Activity in Australia, (2025)
6 Savira, Feby, Use of General Practitioner Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Regional Victoria, Australia: Retrospective Analysis, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, (2023)
7 Fisher, Katie, General practice trainees’ telehealth use during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study, Family Practice, 40, 5-6, pp. 638-647, (2023)
8 Hardie, R. A., General practice perspective on the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia using an Action Research approach: A qualitative study, BMJ Open, 12, 10, (2022)
9 de Guzman, Keshia R., GP perceptions of telehealth services in Australia: a qualitative study, BJGP Open, 6, 1, pp. 1-11, (2022)
10 Smyth, Lillian, Clinician perspectives on rapid transition to telehealth during COVID-19 in Australia - A qualitative study, Australian Health Review, (2022)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers