Drop-out in dual VET: why we should consider the drop-out direction when analysing drop-out

Abstract

Despite high drop-out rates from vocational education and training (VET) throughout most countries and a long research tradition on potential drop-out reasons, little is known about the effects exerted on drop-out intentions by the quality of training. Furthermore, only rarely do scholars distinguish between different drop-out directions, and systematic insights on possibly differing causes are scarce. This study explores the factors influencing four directions of drop-out intention (‘upwards’, ‘downwards’, ‘company change’, ‘occupation change’). Linear regression modelling is used to analyse survey data on the motivation, socio-demographic aspects and competency of 562 trainees as industrial management assistants in Germany and on how they perceived the training quality. The results show that different directions of drop-out intention stem from various factors, with training quality in general having the largest effect. Additionally, the findings indicate a two-tier-scheme of influence factors, ‘core’ and ‘direction-typical’ factors. © 2022, The Author(s).

Keywords

Author Keywords

vocational education and training Training quality Intention Drop-out Direction Downward Upward

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations

Research Assistant at the Chair of Economic and Business Education - Competency Development and Training Quality, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Funding & Acknowledgements

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG

Grant: KL 3076/2-1

This research study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), within the project ‘Competence development through enculturation’ (KL 3076/2-1).

References 10 References

1 Aarkrog, Vibe, Decision-making processes among potential dropouts in vocational education and training and adult learning, International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 5, 2, pp. 111-129, (2018)

2 Bildung in Deutschland 2010, (2010)

3 Drop Out and the Wisconsin Apprenticeship Program A Descriptive and Econometric Analysis, (1972)

4 Bean, John P., A Conceptual Model of Nontraditional Undergraduate Student Attrition, Review of Educational Research, 55, 4, pp. 485-540, (1985)

5 Bessey, Donata, Staying within or leaving the apprenticeship system? Revisions of educational choices in apprenticeship training, Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik, 235, 6, pp. 539-552, (2015)

6 Biggs, John B., What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning, International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21, 1, pp. 57-75, (1999)

7 Educ Res Rev

8 Böhn, Svenja, Training conditions in VET – A qualitative meta-synthesis for the operationalization in apprentice questionnaires, Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie, 33, 1, pp. 49-70, (2019)

9 Böhn, Svenja, Development and Validation of a Learning Quality Inventory for In-Company Training in VET (VET-LQI), Vocations and Learning, 14, 1, pp. 23-53, (2021)

10 Datenbank Auszubildende Des Bundesinstituts Fur Berufsbildung Bibb Auf Basis Der Daten Der Berufsbildungsstatistik Der Statistischen Amter Des Bundes Und Der Lander, (2020)

Drop-out in dual VET: why we should consider the drop-out direction when analysing drop-out

How to Cite