Review Gold Open Access 2022

Empirical Findings on Learning Success and Competence Development at Learning Factories: A Scoping Review

Education Sciences
Journal · Vol. 12 · Issue 11 · Art. 769
Abstract

To meet the changing competence requirements for employees in engineering professions, education and training need to adapt accordingly. Learning factories offer various possibilities to design or integrate practice-oriented learning into training measures. Whether this approach in fact facilitates learning and competence development is rarely investigated. For this reason, the objective of this scoping review is to analyze and summarize the existing empirical findings on learning success and competence development in learning factories regarding their evaluation methods and results. Following standardized guidelines (PRISMA, JBI) for scoping reviews, 12 databases were researched. The literature screening led to the identification of 24 publications included in the final analysis. The results indicate that a variety of evaluation methods are used to assess learning and competences at learning factories and that criteria of all four competence facets (professional, methodological, social, and self-competence) can be enhanced at learning factories in general. As many of the identified studies show potential for improvement regarding the quality of the used methods and analysis of results, further studies on these topics are needed. Evaluations should be integrated into all training measures at learning factories to ensure learning success and competence development and to be able to readjust design, structure, and didactics where necessary. © 2022 by the authors.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Engineering education Scoping review Competence Learning competence development Learning factory

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Industrial, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Niedersachsen, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF
Grant: 16SV7556
This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), reference number 16SV7556. We also acknowledge support with the APC by the Open Access Publication Funds of Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF
This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), reference number 16SV7556. We also acknowledge support with the APC by the Open Access Publication Funds of Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany.
Technische Universität Braunschweig
This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), reference number 16SV7556. We also acknowledge support with the APC by the Open Access Publication Funds of Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany.
References 10 References
1 Kauffeld, Simone, Digitalized working world, Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Organisationspsychologie, 51, 1, (2020)
2 Kauffeld, Simone, Skills and their development in the working world of tomorrow: Industry-independent, individualized, connected, digitized?, Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Organisationspsychologie, 52, 1, (2021)
3 Proc Eur Conf Educ Res Ecer, (2021)
4 Kipper, L. M., Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0, Technology in Society, 64, (2021)
5 Blumberg, Verena Simone Lore, Competencies and competence development in industry 4.0, Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Organisationspsychologie, 52, 2, pp. 203-225, (2021)
6 CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering, (2025)
7 Abele, Eberhard, Learning Factories: Concepts, Guidelines, Best-Practice Examples, Learning Factories: Concepts, Guidelines, Best-Practice Examples, pp. 1-464, (2018)
8 Munn, Zachary, Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 1, (2018)
9 Gusenbauer, Michael, Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources, Research Synthesis Methods, 11, 2, pp. 181-217, (2020)
10 Arksey, Hilary, Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework, International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8, 1, pp. 19-32, (2005)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
10
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers