Article Gold Open Access 2022

How immigrant optimism shapes educational transitions over the educational life course–Empirical evidence from Germany

Frontiers in Education
Journal · Vol. 7 · Art. 894249
Abstract

Compared to natives, young adults with an immigrant background are more likely to choose academic education over vocational education and training (VET). Our study investigates ethnic choice effects at different stages of the educational system. Based on longitudinal data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), we found that immigrant youths–when controlling for achievement and social background–were more likely to attend academic tracks in Grade 9, have higher participation rates in academic tracks at the upper-secondary level, are less likely to choose VET after lower-secondary education as well as after upper-secondary education, and switch more often to higher education after achieving an upper-secondary degree. Mediation analyses confirmed that these effects were largely shaped by differences in educational and occupational aspirations. Our study provides detailed insights into the transition pathways at different educational stages and the relevant mechanisms driving migration-specific choice effects. As ethnic choice effects are empirically well documented in international research, our investigation may contribute to a deeper understanding of educational inequalities in other European countries. © © 2022 Busse and Scharenberg.

Keywords

Author Keywords

vocational education and training (VET) Immigrant optimism academic education educational transitions ethnic choice effects secondary ethnic effects

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Chair of Business Education and Human Resource Development, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Gottingen, Niedersachsen, Germany
Department of Educational Sciences, Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF
Funding text 1: This manuscript uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (see ): Starting Cohort 4, Grade 9, doi: 10.5157/NEPS:SC4:12.0.0 . From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS has been carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network. We acknowledge the support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.; Funding text 2: This manuscript uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (see Blossfeld and Roßbach, 2019): Starting Cohort 4, Grade 9, doi: 10.5157/NEPS:SC4:12.0.0. From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS has been carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network. We acknowledge the support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, GAU
Funding text 1: This manuscript uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (see ): Starting Cohort 4, Grade 9, doi: 10.5157/NEPS:SC4:12.0.0 . From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS has been carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network. We acknowledge the support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.; Funding text 2: This manuscript uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (see Blossfeld and Roßbach, 2019): Starting Cohort 4, Grade 9, doi: 10.5157/NEPS:SC4:12.0.0. From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS has been carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network. We acknowledge the support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsverläufe, LIfBi
Funding text 1: This manuscript uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (see ): Starting Cohort 4, Grade 9, doi: 10.5157/NEPS:SC4:12.0.0 . From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS has been carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network. We acknowledge the support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.; Funding text 2: This manuscript uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (see Blossfeld and Roßbach, 2019): Starting Cohort 4, Grade 9, doi: 10.5157/NEPS:SC4:12.0.0. From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS has been carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network. We acknowledge the support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
References 10 References
1 Azur, Melissa J., Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work?, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20, 1, pp. 40-49, (2011)
2 Schulen Auf Einen Blick, (2012)
3 Becker, Birgit, Cognitive and language skills of Turkish children in Germany: A comparison of the second and third generation and mixed generational groups, International Migration Review, 45, 2, pp. 426-459, (2011)
4 Becker, Birgit, The primary effect of ethnic origin – rooted in early childhood? An analysis of the educational disadvantages of Turkish-origin children during the transition to secondary education in Germany, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 75, (2021)
5 Beicht, Ursula, Transitions of young migrants to initial vocational education and training in Germany: the significance of social origin and gender, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 69, 3, pp. 424-449, (2017)
6 Beicht, Ursula, Transition to company-based vocational training in Germany by young people from a migrant background – The influence of region of origin and generation status, International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6, 1, pp. 20-45, (2019)
7 Sage Handbook of Regression Analysis and Causal Inference, (2015)
8 Birkelund, Jesper Fels, Aiming High and Missing the Mark? Educational Choice, Dropout Risk, and Achievement in Upper Secondary Education among Children of Immigrants in Denmark, European Sociological Review, 36, 3, pp. 395-412, (2020)
9 Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, (2011)
10 Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, (2011)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
16
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers