Article 2022

Springboard MNEs under de-globalization

Journal of International Business Studies
Journal · Vol. 53 · Issue 4 · pp. 767-780
Abstract

Competing in an era of de-globalization presents new challenges for multinationals, particularly for those from large emerging economies. Emerging market MNEs (EMNEs) in the past benefited from an open, globalizing context that facilitates springboard and compositional strategies. De-globalization makes it significantly harder for them to continue this journey. This study tackles the question of what it takes for EMNEs to execute compositional springboard strategies in the new era, making five points. First, de-globalization implies difficulties for EMNEs to acquire global open resources and needed strategic options. Second, uneven de-globalization has a differential impact on the ability of EMNEs from different countries and different sectors to execute springboard strategies. Third, varieties of capitalism represent an underestimated obstacle to compositional springboard strategies, both in general and in interaction with de-globalization. Fourth, EMNEs can consider a double-loop springboard – doubling down on inward internationalization and treating inward internationalization as a series of iterative, continuous, and transformative resource acquisition loops. Finally, springboard MNEs need to reconfigure their global posture strategies and bolster their critical capabilities in pursuit of sustained advantages in a de-globalization world. © 2021, Academy of International Business.

Keywords

Author Keywords

de-globalization emerging emerging market MNEs market firms springboard MNEs

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Miami Herbert Business School, Coral Gables, FL, United States, Sun Yat-sen Business School, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
INSEAD, Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Wary of China Europe and Others Push Back on Foreign Takeovers, (2018)
2 De Globalisation Global Value Chains in the Post Covid 19 Age, (2020)
3 Global Strategy Journal, (2012)
4 Beck, Nikolaus, The cultural dependence of vocational training, Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 8, pp. 1374-1395, (2009)
5 Boisot, Max H., Which way through the open door? Reflections on the internationalization of Chinese firms, Management and Organization Review, 4, 3, pp. 349-365, (2008)
6 Cantwell, John A., An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment, Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 4, pp. 567-586, (2010)
7 Chase-Dunn, Christopher K., Trade globalization since 1795: waves of integration in the world-system, American Sociological Review, 65, 1, pp. 77-95, (2000)
8 Cherry, Judith, Upgrading the 'software': The EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement and sociocultural barriers to trade and investment, Pacific Review, 25, 2, pp. 247-268, (2012)
9 Central Intelligence Agency Cia the World Factbook, (2020)
10 undefined, (2020)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
81
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers