Article 2022

Gender Differences in the Motivational Profile of Undergraduate Students in Light of Self-Determination Theory: The Case of Online Learning Setting

Journal of Social Studies Education Research
Journal · Vol. 13 · Issue 1 · pp. 75-103
Abstract

Motivation has a vital role in successful learning and has garnered the interest of numerous scholars in a wide array of contexts, especially education. Despite such influence, literature in motivation has inconsistent findings with regard to gender. Also, shifting to online learning as a consequence of COVID-19 has impacted students’ academic motivation. This study is novel as it is the first to classify motivation types according to self-determination theory among Jordanian undergraduates in online learning environment throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, it examined the motivational Jordanian undergraduate profile and investigated the same in relation to gender. This study employed a quantitative approach with a web-based questionnaire. The study sample comprised 433 undergraduates who were enrolled in online courses offered at the University of Jordan. The data were collected in September of the academic year 2021–2022 using the academic motivation scale. Mann–Whitney U test was performed to examine gender differences in motivation type. Results demonstrated significant gender difference in motivation types. Females had more self-determination (U = 19,106, p =.024), intrinsic motivation to experience stimulation (U = 17,030, p =.000), identified regulation (U = 14,997, p =.000), and introjected regulation (U = 17,557, p =.000), while males had more amotivation (U = 17,557, p =.000). Implications of this study can inform online instructors and decision-makers to carefully consider online learning settings and employ intrinsic motivation strategies to boost students’ self-determination and enhance their motivation quality. © 2022, Association for Social Studies Educa. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

motivation online learning gender difference Self-determination theory Academic Motivation Scale

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Global Structure of the Academic Motivation Scale A Psychometric Study on A Sample of Sixth Grade Students and the Tenth in the Schools of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency Unrwa in Jordan, (2009)
2 Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, (2019)
3 Journal of Critical Reviews, (2020)
4 Alexandris, K., Perceived constraints on recreational sport participation: Investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation, Journal of Leisure Research, 34, 3, pp. 233-252, (2002)
5 Al-Kumaim, Nabil Hasan, Exploring the Impact of Transformation to Fully Online Learning During COVID-19 on Malaysian University Students’ Academic Life and Performance, International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15, 5, pp. 140-158, (2021)
6 Journal of Educational Sciences, (2018)
7 Amrai, Kourosh, The relationship between academic motivation and academic achievement students, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp. 399-402, (2011)
8 Theory and Practice of Online Learning, (2004)
9 Antunes, Raul De Sousa Nogueira, Exploring lifestyle habits, physical activity, anxiety and basic psychological needs in a sample of portuguese adults during covid-19, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 12, pp. 1-13, (2020)
10 Ardeńska, Magdalena, Validity and reliability of the Polish version of the Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and amotivation, Health Psychology Report, 7, 3, pp. 254-266, (2019)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
20
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85128339373
  • Language English