Book 2025

Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching

Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching
Journal · pp. 1-389
Abstract

Society will not fully benefit from development and use of future discoveries and innovations if we do not provide full access and opportunity to engage in effective STEM education - and we may lack the information, tools, and resources needed to address future challenges facing our planet. Commonly used methods of teaching undergraduate STEM education benefit only a relatively small percentage of learners, leading many to choose not to enroll in STEM courses or pursue STEM careers. This trend severely limits participation in the STEM careers that play a critical role in our nation's prosperity. High quality instruction, learning, and engagement in STEM should be a key priority for colleges and universities across the United States. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching calls on leaders of institutions and academic units, instructors, and other stakeholders to leverage their important roles to improve the landscape of undergraduate STEM education so that all students can thrive. As one step toward addressing inequities and transforming undergraduate STEM education, this report presents a set of Principles for Equitable and Effective Teaching. These Principles provide guidance for instruction that draw on decades of research on teaching, learning and equity. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education provides guidance for improving teaching and related changes to the institutional context that are needed to support instructors and enable student-centered undergraduate STEM education. © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Teaching Professional aspects Curricula Students Colleges and universities STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) STEM education Effective teaching Future challenges High quality Information resource Information tools Methods of teachings Provide guidances STEM careers
Author Affiliations
Cockrell School of Engineering, Austin, TX, United States, Executive Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs, University of Texas System, Austin, TX, United States
Wesleyan University Middletown, Middletown, CT, United States, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., United States, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 System of Professions an Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, (1988)
2 Acevedo-Gil, Nancy, Enacting Spiritual Activism to Develop a Sense of Belonging: Latina Community College Students Choosing and Persisting in STEM, Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 14, 1, pp. 59-78, (2021)
3 Acevedo-Gil, Nancy, Latinas/os in Community College Developmental Education: Increasing Moments of Academic and Interpersonal Validation, Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14, 2, pp. 101-127, (2015)
4 Fond Du Lac Tribal and Community College, (2024)
5 Addy, Tracie Marcella, ENHANCING INCLUSIVE INSTRUCTION: Student Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Advancing Equity in Higher Education, Enhancing Inclusive Instruction: Student Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Advancing Equity in Higher Education, pp. 1-260, (2024)
6 What Inclusive Instructors do Principles and Practices for Excellence in College Teaching, (2021)
7 To Improve the Academy A Journal of Educational Development, (2021)
8 Journal of Educational Research and Practice, (2022)
9 Ahmad, Zubair, Undergraduate Research Experience Models: A systematic review of the literature from 2011 to 2021, International Journal of Educational Research, 114, (2022)
10 Aikens, Melissa L., Race and gender differences in undergraduate research mentoring structures and research outcomes, CBE Life Sciences Education, 16, 2, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
6
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers