Book chapter 2022

The Politics of Social Inclusion in Collective Skill Formation Systems: Actors, Coalitions, and Policies

Collective Skill Formation in the Knowledge Economy
Journal · pp. 128-153
Abstract

Which policies aimed at expanding access to collective skill formation systems receive political support and which ones are likely to be successful? This chapter answers this question by analysing social inclusion policies which were implemented successfully and policies that were proposed, debated but ultimately quashed in Austria and Germany since the 1990s. By theorizing and scrutinizing empirically the preference formation process of trade unions, firms, employers’ organizations, and governments, we shed light on the multi-faceted and variable coalitional politics of socially inclusive measures and draw four conclusions. First, coalitions in favour or against inclusive measures can feature both class conflict and cross-class coalitions. Second, left-leaning governments and unions are most likely to show first-order preferences towards inclusive measures. Third, inclusive measures are politically most feasible when they do not impinge on the efficiency and control dimension. Finally, governments can soften employers’ stance towards socially inclusive measures by granting them more control over the administration of the measures. In sum, the findings highlight the political constraints towards fostering social inclusion through vocational training in the knowledge economy and show how governments can overcome them. © Oxford University Press 2022.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Social inclusion social partners Trade unions comparative political economy Collective Skill Formation Systems

Index Keywords

Employment Commerce Social inclusion Industrial relations Political economy Trade unions Formation systems Austria Political support Comparative political economy Collective skill formation system Formation process Social partner
Author Affiliations
The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Press Release, (2012)
2 Press Release, (2020)
3 Allianz Fur Aus Und Weiterbildung 2015 2018, (2014)
4 Baccaro, Lucio, Throwing out the ballast: Growth models and the liberalization of German industrial relations, Socio-Economic Review, 15, 1, pp. 85-115, (2017)
5 Mehr Jugendbeschaftigung Durch Praxisnahe Qualifizierung Und Gute Wirtschaftliche Rahmenbedingungen, (2014)
6 Fachkrafte Mangel Bekampfen Wettbewerbsfahigkeit Sichern, (2015)
7 Ausbildungsbonus Auf Benachteiligte Altbewerber Begren Zen Berlin Bundesvereinigung Der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbande, (2008)
8 Wir Brauchen Alle Berlin Bundesvereinigung Der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbande, (2014)
9 Benassi, Chiara, Straight to the Core - Explaining Union Responses to the Casualization of Work: The IG Metall Campaign for Agency Workers, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53, 3, pp. 533-555, (2015)
10 Benassi, Chiara, Comparative institutional disadvantage: Small firms and vocational training in the British manufacturing sector in comparative perspective, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 60, 2, pp. 371-390, (2022)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers