Article Gold Open Access 2025

Transforming Learning Environments: Asset Management, Social Innovation and Design Thinking for Educational Facilities 5.0

Education Sciences
Journal · Vol. 15 · Issue 8 · Art. 967
Abstract

Educational institutions are facing a crisis characterized by the need to address diverse learning styles and vocational aspirations, exacerbated by ongoing financial pressures. To navigate these challenges effectively, there is an urgent need to innovate educational practices and learning environments, ensuring they are adaptable and responsive to the evolving needs of students and the workforce. The adoption of the Industry 5.0 framework offers a promising solution, providing a holistic approach that emphasizes the integration of human creativity and advanced technologies to transform educational institutions into resilient, human-centric, and sustainable learning environments. In this context, this article presents a transdisciplinary methodology that integrates Asset Management (AM) with Social Innovation (SI) through Design Thinking (DT) to co-design Educational Facilities 5.0 with stakeholders. The application of the proposed approach in an AgroLab case study—a food and agricultural laboratory—demonstrates how the methodology enables the definition of an Educational Facility 5.0 and generates AM Design Knowledge to support informed decision-making in the subsequent design, implementation, and operation phases. Following DT principles—where knowledge emerges through iterative experimentation and insights from practical applications—this article also discusses the role of SI and DT in AM, the role of Large Language Models in convergent processes, and a vision for Educational Facilities 5.0. © 2025 by the authors.

Keywords

Author Keywords

education design thinking Industry 5.0 Decision Making asset management co-design large language model social innovation stakeholder engagement transdisciplinarity

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Design, Production and Management, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands
Department of Design, Universidad de Los Andes, Colombia, Bogota, Distrito Capital, Colombia
Department of Education, Clermont School, Bogota, Colombia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Learning Factories, (2019)
2 Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, (1989)
3 Education 5 0 Requirements Enabling Technologies and Future Directions, (2023)
4 Alkhnbashi, Omer S., Education in Transition: Adapting and Thriving in a Post-COVID World, Systems, 12, 10, (2024)
5 Almeida, Nuno Marques, A conceptual construct on value for infrastructure asset management, Utilities Policy, 75, (2022)
6 Antelm-Lanzat, Ana María, Learning styles and vocational guidance in secondary education, Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20, 3, pp. 1-15, (2020)
7 Barbieri, Giacomo, Organizational Value Framework for Asset Management Decision-Making, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58, 8, pp. 395-400, (2024)
8 Barbieri, Giacomo, A case study for problem-based learning education in fault diagnosis assessment, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53, 3, pp. 107-112, (2020)
9 Barbieri, Giacomo, Strategic capital investments in asset management: a value-based approach, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 31, 5, pp. 1-22, (2024)
10 Bernacki, Matthew L., A Systematic Review of Research on Personalized Learning: Personalized by Whom, to What, How, and for What Purpose(s)?, Educational Psychology Review, 33, 4, pp. 1675-1715, (2021)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers