Article Gold Open Access 2021

Expert perspectives on the performance of explosive detection canines: Performance degrading factors

Animals
Journal · Vol. 11 · Issue 7 · Art. 1978
Abstract

The explosive detection canine (EDC) team is currently the best available mobile sensor capability in the fight against explosive threats. While the EDC can perform at a high level, the EDC team faces numerous factors during the search process that may degrade performance. Understanding these factors is key to effective selection, training, assessment, deployment, and operationalizable research. A systematic description of these factors is absent from the literature. This qualitative study leveraged the perspectives of expert EDC handlers, trainers, and leaders (n = 17) to determine the factors that degrade EDC performance. The participants revealed factors specific to utilization, the EDC team, and the physical, climate, operational, and explosive odor environments. Key results were the reality of performance degradation, the impact of the handler, and the importance of preparation. This study’s results can help improve EDC selection, training, assessment, and deployment and further research into sustaining EDC performance. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

Author Keywords

performance requirements Canine Deployment Detection Explosive

Index Keywords

adult female human male Article qualitative research leadership clinical article odor climate
Author Affiliations
Joint Base San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States, Department of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Department of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Department of Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Penn-Barwell, Jowan G., Acute bilateral leg amputation following combat injury in UK servicemen, Injury, 45, 7, pp. 1105-1110, (2014)
2 Barzilai, Liran, Characteristics of improvised explosive device trauma casualties in the Gaza strip and other combat regions: The Israeli experience, Wounds, 27, 8, pp. 209-214, (2015)
3 EMS Improvised Explosive Devices and Terrorist Activity, (2020)
4 Harper, Ross J., Identification of dominant odor chemicals emanating from explosives for use in developing optimal training aid combinations and mimics for canine detection, Talanta, 67, 2, pp. 313-327, (2005)
5 Furton, Kenneth G., The scientific foundation and efficacy of the use of canines as chemical detectors for explosives, Talanta, 54, 3, pp. 487-500, (2001)
6 Farr, Brian D., Operational requirements of explosive detection canines: Expert perspectives, Animals, 11, 7, (2021)
7 Gazit, Irit, Explosives detection by sniffer dogs following strenuous physical activity, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81, 2, pp. 149-161, (2003)
8 Hayes, James E., Critical review of dog detection and the influences of physiology, training, and analytical methodologies, Talanta, 185, pp. 499-512, (2018)
9 Lazarowski, Lucia, Selecting Dogs for Explosives Detection: Behavioral Characteristics, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, (2020)
10 Johnen, Dorothea, An approach to identify bias in scent detection dog testing, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 189, pp. 1-12, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
8
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers