Article Gold Open Access 2025

Gender differences in motivation and problem-solving in a physics course online problem-based learning

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
Journal · Vol. 14 · Issue 4 · pp. 2832-2845
Abstract

Online learning has been crucial since COVID-19, yet its effectiveness, particularly in physics education, remains debated. Understanding students’ motivation and problem-solving abilities in online environments is critical. This paper examined and presented the gender difference in motivation and problem-solving skills using an integrated online problem-based learning (iON-PBL) in a physics course. Developed using analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation (ADDIE) mode, iON-PBL module of physics guided students through problem-solving activities over 13 weeks. A post-test–delayed post-test design was used to assess retention of motivation and problem-solving skills. The study involved 116 pre-university students from Universiti Malaysia Sabah (88 females, 28 males). Motivation was measured using the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) (four components), and problem-solving skills were assessed with the problem-solving inventory (PSI) (three components). Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 28. Findings showed a significant gender difference in the ‘cognitive strategy’ component of motivation at the post-test, favoring female students. However, this difference was not sustained in the delayed post-test. In contrast, no gender difference was found in problemsolving at the post-test, but females scored significantly higher in ‘personal control’ in the delayed post-test. These findings suggest that female students are more likely to maintain cognitive strategies and personal control in online learning. Educators should consider targeted strategies to support male students’ motivation and problem-solving development in virtual environments to foster gender equity. Educators should consider targeted strategies to support male students’ motivation and problem-solving development in virtual environments to foster gender equity. © 2025, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

motivation Gender perspectives iON-PBL Physics Pre-university Problem-solving skills

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Preparatory Centre for Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
School of Computing and Digital Technologies, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
English Language and Literature, National Institute of Education, Singapore City, Singapore
Funding & Acknowledgements
Universiti Malaysia Sabah
Grant: SGA0027-2020
This manuscript is part of the first author\u2019s Ph.D. study with a scholarship from Universiti Malaysia Sabah. The study was also supported by a grant from Universiti Malaysia Sabah, coded SGA0027-2020.
References 10 References
1 International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, (2023)
2 Learning Science and Mathematics, (2021)
3 Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 2025, (2025)
4 Mahmud, Siti Nur Diyana, Science teacher education in Malaysia: Challenges and way forward, Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4, 1, pp. 1-12, (2018)
5 Social and Management Research Journal, (2019)
6 Oon, Emily Pey Tee, On the declining interest in physics among students-from the perspective of teachers, International Journal of Science Education, 33, 5, pp. 727-746, (2011)
7 International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, (2022)
8 Charlesworth, Tessa E.S., Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions, Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 37, pp. 7228-7243, (2019)
9 Wang, Xiang, Key factors predicting problem-based learning in online environments: Evidence from multimodal learning analytics, Frontiers in Psychology, 14, (2023)
10 Global Gender Gap Report 2020, (2020)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers