Article Gold Open Access 2025

Academic Integrity Elements using Technological Media Tools in Peer Assessment Implementation: Fuzzy Delphi

Journal of Advanced Research Design
Journal · Vol. 131 · Issue 1 · pp. 17-25
Abstract

In recent years, there have been many concerns about issues related to integrity and ethics among students when completing tasks using technological media tools. Peer evaluations indirectly influence early moral representations through other people's evaluations of their self-representations while interacting with others. This research aims to explore the element of academic integrity using technological media tools in peer assessment implementation. The expert participants for this Fuzzy Delphi study were selected using purposive sampling. A questionnaire was used to obtain the consent of 15 experts in the field of technology education and classroom assessment related to academic integrity elements using technological media tools in peer assessment implementation. The data from this research has been analysed using the Fuzzy Delphi formula. These results show that the five (5) elements of academic integrity: attitude, personality, behaviour, commitment and professional practice have been approved by experts as elements of academic integrity using technological media tools in the implementation of peer assessment. Therefore, peer assessment boosts students' confidence and encourages healthy discussion. © 2025, Penerbit Akademia Baru. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Peer Assessment Academic integrity Fuzzy Delphi technological media tools

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Vocational and Technology Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Ministry of Higher Education, MOHE
Grant: FRGS/1/2021/SSI0/UTHM/03/15
This research was supported by Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) trough Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2021/SSI0/UTHM/03/15).
References 10 References
1 Gunning, Tiffany K., Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 1, (2022)
2 Topping, Keith James, Digital Hardware for Peer Assessment in K-12 Schools and Universities, Frontiers in Education, 6, (2021)
3 English Language Teaching, (2016)
4 Double, Kit S., The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies, Educational Psychology Review, 32, 2, pp. 481-509, (2020)
5 Wiliam, Dylan, How Can Assessment Support Learning? A Response to Wilson and Shepard, Penuel, and Pellegrino, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37, 1, pp. 42-44, (2018)
6 International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, (2017)
7 Bozkurt, Fisun, Teacher candidates' views on self and peer assessment as a tool for student development, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45, 1, pp. 47-60, (2020)
8 Omar, Dk Siti Nabilah Pengiran, The Use of Peer Assessment to Improve Students’ Learning of Geometry, European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 8, 1, pp. 60-91, (2021)
9 Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, (2017)
10 How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, (2003)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers