Article Gold Open Access 2021

Competences for implementation science: what trainees need to learn and where they learn it

Advances in Health Sciences Education
Journal · Vol. 26 · Issue 1 · pp. 19-35
Abstract

Education in implementation science, which involves the training of health professionals in how to implement evidence-based findings into health practice systematically, has become a highly relevant topic in health sciences education. The present study advances education in implementation science by compiling a competence profile for implementation practice and research and by exploring implementation experts’ sources of expertise. The competence profile is theoretically based on educational psychology, which implies the definition of improvable and teachable competences. In an online-survey, an international, multidisciplinary sample of 82 implementation experts named competences that they considered most helpful for conducting implementation practice and implementation research. For these competences, they also indicated whether they had acquired them in their professional education, additional training, or by self-study and on-the-job experience. Data were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach that combined qualitative content analyses with descriptive statistics. The participants deemed collaboration knowledge and skills most helpful for implementation practice. For implementation research, they named research methodology knowledge and skills as the most important ones. The participants had acquired most of the competences that they found helpful for implementation practice in self-study or by on-the-job experience. However, participants had learned most of their competences for implementation research in their professional education. The present results inform education and training activities in implementation science and serve as a starting point for a fluid set of interdisciplinary implementation science competences that will be updated continuously. Implications for curriculum development and the design of educational activities are discussed. © 2020, The Author(s).

Keywords

Author Keywords

Training Knowledge transfer Competence Mixed methods Educational Psychology continuing education evidence-based practice Implementation practice Implementation research Implementation science

Index Keywords

Skill adult attitude to health clinical competence female human male psychology Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Article Vocational education education health care personnel Health Personnel human experiment professional competence program evaluation Curriculum development organization and management methodology Content analysis cooperation Cooperative Behavior implementation science job experience Psychology, Educational Research Design
Author Affiliations
Department of Developmental Psychology, Universität Wien, Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Department of Maternal and Child Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
Department of Maternal and Child Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
Universität Salzburg, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
Active Implementation Research Network, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
Universität Wien
Open access funding provided by University of Vienna. We thank Evelyn Steinberg (formerly Bergsmann), Carrie Martin Blanchard, Donna Burton, Monika Finsterwald, Joumana Haidar and Herbert Peterson for their valuable feedback on a previous version of the online survey. We also thank Jen Schroeder and Kelly Huber for their support in distributing the survey to the participants of the Global Implementation Conference.
References 10 References
1 Bergsmann, Evelyn Maria, The Competence Screening Questionnaire for Higher Education: Adaptable to the needs of a study programme, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 4, pp. 537-554, (2018)
2 Bergsmann, Evelyn Maria, Evaluation of competence-based teaching in higher education: From theory to practice, Evaluation and Program Planning, 52, pp. 1-9, (2015)
3 Blanchard, Carrie Martin, The Active Implementation Frameworks: A roadmap for advancing implementation of Comprehensive Medication Management in Primary care, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13, 5, pp. 922-929, (2017)
4 Blömeke, Sigrid, Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 223, 1, pp. 3-13, (2015)
5 Chambers, David A., Mapping training needs for dissemination and implementation research: lessons from a synthesis of existing D&I research training programs, Translational Behavioral Medicine, 7, 3, pp. 593-601, (2017)
6 Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, (2003)
7 Damschroder, Laura J., Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science, Implementation Science, 4, 1, (2009)
8 Durlak, Joseph A., Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation, American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 3-4, pp. 327-350, (2008)
9 Eccles, Martin Paul, Welcome to implementation science, Implementation Science, 1, 1, (2006)
10 Eriksson, Charli, Academic practice–policy partnerships for health promotion research: Experiences from three research programs, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42, pp. 88-95, (2014)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
53
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers