Educational and research utility of the registrar clinical encounters in training (ReCEnT) project: an exploration of mechanisms using the context, input, process and product (CIPP) framework

Abstract

Background The Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) project is an Australian general practice vocational training programme with integrated and interdependent education and research functions. Trainees (registrars) contemporaneously document in-consultation clinical experience and actions. Objectives Using a realist lens, we elucidate the mechanisms underpinning project outcomes to answer questions around programme effectiveness, impacts, sustainability and the lessons and findings that are translatable to other primary care training programmes. Methods The context, input, process and product framework was used. As a means to understand the interactions between each of the interdependent components, it allows for inferences regarding causal mechanisms for specific outcomes. Results Context: ReCEnT occurs within an apprenticeship-like model of general practice vocational training entailing a central supervisor/apprentice relationship. ReCEnT has demystified the content and characteristics of registrar consultations. Input: multiple stakeholder involvement is both advantageous and a logistical challenge, with the programme's success dependent on registrars, practices and training providers providing detailed and accurate data, with prompt subsequent processing. Process: contemporaneous consultation data collection in different stages of training constitutes a component of registrars' programmatic assessment. Product: individualised feedback provides educational benefit through reflection. Clinical and educational research questions can be addressed with resulting research translation feeding back into the programme model and government policy. Clinical behaviour change is also evaluated. Conclusion ReCEnT is unique, globally, in its scope and longevity (2010-present). Creation of meaningful, individualised feedback facilitates reflection and provides both immediate educational benefits and the substrate for further research, programme and policy design and targeted formal teaching and learning. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025.

Keywords

Author Keywords

education Family Practice General Practice

Index Keywords

clinical competence human Humans Article Vocational education Australia education general practice general practitioner controlled study practice guideline primary medical care program evaluation education program behavior change general practise registrar program effectiveness stakeholder participation total quality management

Author Affiliations

School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, Australia, GP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Discipline of General Practice, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Academic Unit of General Practice, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia, Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, ACT, Australia

Funding & Acknowledgements

No funding information

References 10 References

1 Roberts, Richard G., Family medicine training--the international experience., The Medical journal of Australia, 194, 11, pp. S84-87, (2011)

2 Wearne, Susan M., Educating registrars in your practice, Australian Family Physician, 45, 5, pp. 274-277, (2016)

3 Hays, Richard B., Australian and overseas models of general practice training., The Medical journal of Australia, 194, 11, pp. S63-64, (2011)

4 Tran, Michael M.A., Early-career general practitioners’ perceptions of the utility of vocational training for subsequent independent practice, Education for Primary Care, 34, 2, pp. 74-82, (2023)

5 Davey, Andrew R., The Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) cohort study: updated protocol, BMC Primary Care, 23, 1, (2022)

6 Morgan, Simon, Study protocol: the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study., BMC family practice, 13, (2012)

7 New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, (2017)

8 Evaluating Training Programs the Four Levels, (1994)

9 Magin, Parker John, Reducing early career general practitioners' antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: A pragmatic prospective non-randomised controlled trial, Family Practice, 35, 1, pp. 53-60, (2018)

10 Holliday, Simon Mark, Does brief chronic pain management education change opioid prescribing rates? A pragmatic trial in Australian early-career general practitioners, Pain, 158, 2, pp. 278-288, (2017)

Educational and research utility of the registrar clinical encounters in training (ReCEnT) project: an exploration of mechanisms using the context, input, process and product (CIPP) framework

How to Cite