Article Green Open Access 2021

Learning by concordance (LbC) to develop professional reasoning skills: AMEE Guide No. 141

Medical Teacher
Journal · Vol. 43 · Issue 6 · pp. 614-621
Abstract

Developing effective clinical reasoning is central to health professions education. Learning by concordance (LbC) is an on-line educational strategy that makes learners practice reasoning competency in case-based clinical situations. The questions asked are similar to those professionals ask themselves in their practice and participant answers are compared to those of a reference panel. When participants answer the questions, they receive an automated feedback that is two-fold as they see (1) how the panelists respond and (2) justifications each panelist gives for their answer. This provides rich contextual knowledge about the situation, supplemented by a synthesis summarizing crucial points. As many educators in the health sciences are engaging in introducing innovative approaches, many consider building LbC learning modules. Elaborating, designing and implementing a LbC tool remain a challenge. This AMEE Guide describes the steps and elements to be considered when designing a LbC tool, drawing on examples from distinct health professions: medicine, nursing, physiotherapy, and dentistry. Specifically, the following elements will be discussed: (1) LbC theoretical underpinnings; (2) principles of LbC questioning; (3) goals of the concordance-based activity; (4) nature of reasoning tasks; (5) content/levels of complexity; (6) reference panel; (7) feedback/synthesis messages; (8) on-line learning platforms. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Professional education reasoning assessing by concordance education in health sciences Learning by concordance script theory tool design

Index Keywords

E-learning Skill learning adult clinical competence female human male Humans Article Vocational education Problem solving education controlled study medical profession Health Occupations human experiment Educational Measurement clinical reasoning drawing Nursing dentistry synthesis physiotherapy theoretical study
Author Affiliations
Université de Montréal, Faculté de Médecine, Montreal, QC, Canada, Centre de pédagogie appliquée aux sciences de la santé (CPASS), University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, Centre d'innovation en formation infirmière, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Funding & Acknowledgements
McGill University, MGU
We wish to thank the following contributors who have provided examples of LbC tools: Jean-Pierre Dumas3, Julie Lecours1, Anne-Marie Vincent1, Jeannine Kassis1, Louis Guertin1, Robert Gagnon1–2, Diane Robert1, Amélie Foucault1, Stuart Lubarsky4, Maxime Ducret5. 1Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada 2Centre de pédagogie appliquée aux sciences de la santé (CPASS), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada 3Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada 4Faculty of medecine, McGill University, Québec, Canada 5Faculté d’Odontologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
Université de Sherbrooke, UdeS
We wish to thank the following contributors who have provided examples of LbC tools: Jean-Pierre Dumas3, Julie Lecours1, Anne-Marie Vincent1, Jeannine Kassis1, Louis Guertin1, Robert Gagnon1–2, Diane Robert1, Amélie Foucault1, Stuart Lubarsky4, Maxime Ducret5. 1Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada 2Centre de pédagogie appliquée aux sciences de la santé (CPASS), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada 3Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada 4Faculty of medecine, McGill University, Québec, Canada 5Faculté d’Odontologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
Université de Montréal, UDEM
We wish to thank the following contributors who have provided examples of LbC tools: Jean-Pierre Dumas3, Julie Lecours1, Anne-Marie Vincent1, Jeannine Kassis1, Louis Guertin1, Robert Gagnon1–2, Diane Robert1, Amélie Foucault1, Stuart Lubarsky4, Maxime Ducret5. 1Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada 2Centre de pédagogie appliquée aux sciences de la santé (CPASS), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada 3Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada 4Faculty of medecine, McGill University, Québec, Canada 5Faculté d’Odontologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
References 10 References
1 Representation and Understanding Studies in Cognitive Science, (1975)
2 Brown, John Seely, Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning, Educational Researcher, 18, 1, pp. 32-42, (1989)
3 Charlin, Bernard, Scripts and clinical reasoning, Medical Education, 41, 12, pp. 1178-1184, (2007)
4 Pedagogie Medicale, (2026)
5 Comment Mieux Former Et Evaluer Les Etudiants En Medecine Et En Sciences De La Sante, (2016)
6 Charlin, Bernard, Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: Theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research, Academic Medicine, 75, 2, pp. 182-190, (2000)
7 Charlin, Bernard, Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty: The script concordance approach, Evaluation and the Health Professions, 27, 3, pp. 304-319, (2004)
8 American Educator, (1991)
9 Custers, Eugéne J.F.M., Thirty years of illness scripts: Theoretical origins and practical applications, Medical Teacher, 37, 5, pp. 457-462, (2015)
10 Elaboration Dune Autoevaluation Basee Sur La Concordance De Jugement Professionnel Des Enseignants Rapport De Recherche, (2019)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
22
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers