Article Gold Open Access 2021

The continuous intention to use e-learning, from two different perspectives

Education Sciences
Journal · Vol. 11 · Issue 1 · pp. 1-20
Abstract

During the recent vast growth of digitalization, e-learning methods have become the most influential phenomenon at higher educational institutions. E-learning adoption has proved able to shift educational circumstances from the traditional face-to-face teaching environment to a flexible and sharable type of education. An online survey was conducted, consisting of 30 teachers and 342 students in one of the universities in the United Arab Emirates. The results show that teachers’ and students’ perceived technology self-efficacy (TSE), ease of use (PEOU), and usefulness (PU) are the main factors directly affecting the continuous intention to use technology. Instructors’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and perceived organizational support (POS) positively affect the intention to use the technology, whereas students’ controlled motivation (CTRLM) has a greater influence on their intention to use the technology, due to the type of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation that they have and which they can develop throughout the process of learning. The findings support the given hypotheses. In addition, they provide empirical evidence of a relationship between perceived organizational support and perceived pedagogical content knowledge. In fact, they are considered the key factors that support the use of technology continuously. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Perceived ease of use Perceived usefulness E-learning platform PACK Perceived organizational support and technology self-efficacy

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
English Language & Linguistics Department, Al Buraimi University College, Al Buraimi, Al Buraimi, Oman
College of Education, Zayed University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Research Institute of Sciences and Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Wagner, Nicole M., Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders' analysis, Educational Technology and Society, 11, 3, pp. 26-36, (2008)
2 International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, (2013)
3 Luo, Nuan, Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment, Computers and Education, 115, pp. 153-160, (2017)
4 Hong, Jonchao, Internet cognitive failure relevant to users' satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use a government e-learning system, Computers in Human Behavior, 66, pp. 353-362, (2017)
5 Int J Inf Technol Lang Stud, (2019)
6 Alshurideh, Muhammad Turki, Examining the Main Mobile Learning System Drivers’ Effects: A Mix Empirical Examination of Both the Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1058, pp. 406-417, (2020)
7 Salloum, Said A., Understanding the Impact of Social Media Practices on E-Learning Systems Acceptance, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1058, pp. 360-369, (2020)
8 Alshurideh, Muhammad Turki, Understanding the quality determinants that influence the intention to use the mobile learning platforms: A practical study, International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13, 11, pp. 157-183, (2019)
9 Al-Emran, Mostafa, An empirical examination of continuous intention to use m-learning: An integrated model, Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4, pp. 2899-2918, (2020)
10 Investigating Students Acceptance of E Learning System in Higher Educational Environments in the Uae Applying the Extended Technology Acceptance Model Tam, (2018)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
86
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers