Article 2021

A Combination of Self-debriefing and Instructor-led Debriefing Improves Team Effectiveness in Health Science Students

Nurse Educator
Journal · Vol. 46 · Issue 1 · pp. E7-E11
Abstract

Background Debriefing is considered a critical component of simulation-based learning, but the differences between different debriefing methods remain unclear. Purpose The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of the debriefing assessment, problem-solving process, and team effectiveness among students who received instructor-led debriefing, self-debriefing, and combined debriefing. Methods An experimental design was conducted with 250 students (nursing, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy). Differences in the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES), Problem Solving Inventory (PSI), and Communication and Teamwork Skills (CATS) assessment between the groups were measured. Results In nursing students, the combined debriefing group had the highest scores for the CATS assessment (P <.001) and for the coordination (P <.001), cooperation (P =.012), and communication (P =.002) categories. No significant differences were observed between debriefing groups for DES or PSI. Conclusions Combined debriefing improves communication and team skills in students. Educators might promote combined debriefing after simulation sessions as it seems to improve team effectiveness. © Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Simulation Nursing education debriefing health science students team effectiveness

Index Keywords

Skill clinical competence human nursing student procedures Humans Students, Nursing Article interpersonal communication Vocational education Problem solving controlled study nursing education human experiment major clinical study teamwork simulation occupational therapy experimental design Education, Professional physiotherapy communication Nursing Education Research
Author Affiliations
Nursing Department, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain
Physical Therapy Department, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Abatzis, Vaia T., Debriefing in simulation and beyond, International Anesthesiology Clinics, 53, 4, pp. 151-162, (2015)
2 Kim, Young Ju, The utilization of debriefing for simulation in healthcare: A literature review, Nurse Education in Practice, 43, (2020)
3 Boet, Sylvain, Within-team debriefing versus instructor-led debriefing for simulation-based education: A randomized controlled trial, Annals of Surgery, 258, 1, pp. 53-58, (2013)
4 Oikawa, Sayaka, Self-Debriefing vs Instructor Debriefing in a Pre-Internship Simulation Curriculum: Night on Call, Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health, 75, 5, pp. 127-132, (2016)
5 Levett-Jones, Tracy Louise, A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education, Nurse Education Today, 34, 6, pp. e58-e63, (2014)
6 Kang, Kyungja, Comparison of student self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing in nursing simulation: A quasi-experimental study, Nurse Education Today, 65, pp. 67-73, (2018)
7 Boet, Sylvain, Looking in the mirror: Self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises, Critical Care Medicine, 39, 6, pp. 1377-1381, (2011)
8 Ostovar, Shahriar, Comparison of the effects of debriefing methods on psychomotor skills, self-confidence, and satisfaction in novice nursing students: A quasi-experimental study, Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research, 9, 3, (2018)
9 Gaylle, Debrayh, In-simulation Debriefing Increases Therapeutic Communication Skills, Nurse Educator, 44, 6, pp. 295-299, (2019)
10 Schuler, Monika S., Simulation Debriefing Using Kim's Critical Reflective Inquiry Model, Nurse educator, 45, 5, (2020)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
15
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers