Article Gold Open Access 2025

Enhancing Critical Thinking and Collaboration Skills Through Interactive Teaching Methods: A Qualitative Study in Higher Education

International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope
Journal · Vol. 6 · Issue 3 · pp. 275-283
Abstract

Critical thinking and collaboration are essential skills for university students facing rapidly evolving academic and professional landscapes. This qualitative exploratory study investigates several factors that contribute significantly to critical thinking and collaboration skills through interactive teaching. Ten students and five lecturers from urban, middle-class backgrounds participated in four sessions of semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Data were validated by triangulation and analyzed thematically. Three primary factors emerged: (1) interactive modalities Socratic questioning, peer education, structured project-based tasks, and digital simulations which enhance active engagement, cognitive exploration, and peer interaction; (2) inclusive, psychologically safe classroom climates that encourage open communication, risk-taking, and mutual respect; and (3) lecturers’ facilitative roles, including guided discourse, timely constructive feedback, and promotion of independent inquiry. Limitations involve variability from individual differences and institutional contexts. The findings underscore the importance of integrating interactive pedagogies with supportive environments and facilitator-led guidance to cultivate higher-order thinking and collaborative competencies. Practical implications for educators and policymakers include designing holistic, context-sensitive instructional strategies to prepare students for complex challenges, and the need to align course design with Bloom’s Taxonomy and social constructivist principles. Future research should assess the scalability and adaptability of these practices across diverse settings such as high schools, vocational training, and online platforms, and evaluate their long-term impact on student outcomes. © 2025, Iquz Galaxy Publisher. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Critical thinking Higher education Collaboration Skills Interactive Teaching Methods Learning Environment Lecturer Role

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Educational Technology, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Opre, Dana, Supporting students’ active learning with a computer based tool, Active Learning in Higher Education, 25, 1, pp. 135-150, (2024)
2 Indrašiene, Valdone, The critically thinking employee: Employers’ point of view, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7, 4, pp. 2590-2603, (2020)
3 Song, Yi, Exploring approaches for developing and evaluating workplace critical thinking skills, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, (2024)
4 Kurniawan, Dydik, Evaluation of Digital Project Based Blended Learning Model to Improve Students' Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skills, Journal of Ecohumanism, 3, 8, pp. 1875-1895, (2024)
5 Abildinova, Gulmira, Preparing educators for the digital age: teacher perceptions of active teaching methods and digital integration, Frontiers in Education, 9, (2024)
6 Kumar, Sunil, The Effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on Pedagogy and Student Learning Outcome in Higher Education, EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 11, 2, pp. 1-5, (2024)
7 Rodriguez-Dono, Alfonso, Fostering sustainability and critical thinking through debate-a case study, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 11, (2021)
8 Kalmár, Éva, The COVID-19 paradox of online collaborative education: when you cannot physically meet, you need more social interactions, Heliyon, 8, 1, (2022)
9 Mitchell, Elissa Thomann, Using debate in an online asynchronous social policy course, Online Learning Journal, 23, 3, pp. 21-33, (2019)
10 Haffejee, Firoza, The use of photovoice to transform health science students into critical thinkers, BMC Medical Education, 21, 1, (2021)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers