Review 2020

How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis

Educational Research Review
Journal · Vol. 31 · Art. 100334
Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) is gaining popularity in educational processes due to its recognized efficacy for teaching and learning. Many studies have identified the trends, advantages, opportunities, challenges, and impact of this technology on education. However, most of the previous studies failed to analyze the pedagogical approaches, somehow ignoring that the success of an intervention depends not only on the technical characteristics of the technology but also on the pedagogical strategies to implement them. This study presents a quantitative meta-analysis of 46 empirical studies to identify, in the light of the learning theories, how pedagogical approaches affect the impact of AR on education. In addition, we analyzed the impact of moderating variables on students' learning outcomes in AR interventions. The results indicate that the highest impact was obtained when interventions employed the collaborative pedagogical approach. Based on the findings of this study, we provide insights for researchers and practitioners on what characteristics of AR interventions seem to benefit students’ learning outcomes and how pedagogical approaches can be applied in various educational contexts, to guide the design of future AR interventions. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

Author Keywords

Augmented reality meta-analysis Pedagogical Approach Learning Theory

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Universidad Católica de Oriente, Medellin, Colombia, Instituto de Tecnología del Conocimiento, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States
International University of La Rioja, Logrono, La Rioja, Spain
Universidad Católica de Oriente, Medellin, Colombia
Instituto de Tecnología del Conocimiento, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Funding & Acknowledgements
Grant: 201823
The authors are deeply grateful to Universidad Católica de Oriente - Colombia , for having fully supported this project (Grant number: 201823 ).
References 10 References
1 Collaboration Communications and Critical Thinking A Stem Inspired Path Across the Curriculum, (2019)
2 Aebersold, Michelle L., Interactive Anatomy-Augmented Virtual Simulation Training, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 15, pp. 34-41, (2018)
3 Akçayir, Murat, Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature, Educational Research Review, 20, pp. 1-11, (2017)
4 Akçayir, Murat, Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students' laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories, Computers in Human Behavior, 57, pp. 334-342, (2016)
5 Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning Foundations and Applications, (2016)
6 Bacca, Jorge, Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications, Educational Technology and Society, 17, 4, pp. 133-149, (2014)
7 Barmaki, Roghayeh Leila, Enhancement of Anatomical Education Using Augmented Reality: An Empirical Study of Body Painting, Anatomical Sciences Education, 12, 6, pp. 599-609, (2019)
8 Becker, Betsy Jane, Synthesizing standardized mean‐change measures, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 2, pp. 257-278, (1988)
9 Clearing House, (2010)
10 Bernard, Robert M., How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature, Review of Educational Research, 74, 3, pp. 379-439, (2004)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
211
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers