The political dynamics of South Korea's human capital development strategy

Abstract

This article examines the political dynamics of South Korea's human capital development strategy from the early 1960s until today, focusing on the central role of the state. South Korea's state has played a critical role in developing the education and skills training system not only during the period of industrialization but also under the pressures of democratization and globalization, given the lack of strong interests and political capacities of social partners (e.g., business associations and labor unions) in formulating a human capital development strategy. It has advanced a series of education and skills training system reforms to adjust the country to the transformation of the economic structure and the production system, although an available range of policy options have changed over time. Regardless of the type of political regime (e.g., authoritarianism vs. democracy), South Korea has always prioritized the education and skills training system as the driving force of the country's growth and economic competitiveness in the international market. © 2020 Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Higher education Skills vocational education and training (VET) South Korea Human capital development strategy Role of the state

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations

Graduate School of International Studies, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

Funding & Acknowledgements

Seoul National University, SNU

This work was supported by the Seoul National University Research Grant in 2019.

References 10 References

1 5 31 Education Reform and 20 Years, (2015)

2 Ansell, Ben W., Traders, teachers, and tyrants: Democracy, globalization, and public investment in education, International Organization, 62, 2, pp. 289-322, (2008)

3 Ansell, Ben W., From the Ballot to the blackboard: The redistributive political economy of education, From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education, pp. 1-248, (2010)

4 Journal of Education and Work, (2002)

5 Baethge, Martin, The German skill formation model in transition: from dual system of VET to higher education?, Journal for Labour Market Research, 48, 2, pp. 97-112, (2015)

6 Boix, Carles, Political parties and the supply side of the economy: The provision of physical and human capital in advanced economies, 1960-90, American Journal of Political Science, 41, 3, pp. 814-845, (1997)

7 Political Parties Growth and Equality Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy, (1998)

8 Brinton, Mary C., Lost in Transition: Youth, work, and instability in postindustrial Japan, Lost in Transition: Youth, Work, and Instability in Postindustrial Japan, pp. 1-203, (2010)

9 Busemeyer, Marius Raphael, Asset specificity, institutional complementarities and the variety of skill regimes in coordinated market economies, Socio-Economic Review, 7, 3, pp. 375-406, (2009)

10 Busemeyer, Marius Raphael, Social democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education, Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 1, pp. 107-126, (2009)

The political dynamics of South Korea's human capital development strategy

How to Cite