Article 2020

Examining Workplace Affordance and Student Engagement in Engineering Co-op and Internship Literature

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education
Journal · Vol. 20 · Issue 1 · pp. 116-129
Abstract

Co-ops and internships complement students’ classroom learning and constitute important contributors to the quality of engineering education. In light of Stephen Billett’s affordance-engagement framework, we reviewed 30 selected empirical studies on undergraduate engineering students’ co-op and internship experiences. From these studies, we identified three themes with respect to workplace affordances and individual engagement in engineering co-ops and internships. Our analysis not only showed that Billett’s framework offers an enlightening approach to examining engineering students’ workplace learning experiences but also it made the equity dimension of the framework explicit. We call for engineering co-op and internship programs and researchers to go beyond learning outcome assessment alone and shift the attention to uncovering the factors in workplace learning experiences that might have influenced the achievement of desirable learning outcomes. © 2020, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE).

Keywords

Author Keywords

workplace learning Workplace affordances Co-participation Individual engagement

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Funding & Acknowledgements
University of Toronto, U of T
This review paper is part of a larger research project funded by the Dean’s Strategic Fund (Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto).
References 10 References
1 Anderson, Kevin John Boyett, Comparing the learning experiences of male and female engineering students in internship and cooperative educational opportunities, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, (2011)
2 Archer, Margaret Scotford, Structure, agency and the internal conversation, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, pp. 1-372, (2014)
3 Bailey, Reid, Effects of industrial experience and coursework during sophomore and junior years on student learning of engineering design, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 7, pp. 662-667, (2007)
4 Billett, Stephen Richard, Guided learning at work, Journal of Workplace Learning, 12, 7, pp. 272-285, (2000)
5 New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, (2001)
6 Billett, Stephen Richard, Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement, Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 5, pp. 209-214, (2001)
7 Billett, Stephen Richard, Workplace pedagogic practices: Co-participation and learning, British Journal of Educational Studies, 50, 4, pp. 457-481, (2002)
8 Billett, Stephen Richard, Work, change and workers, Work, Change and Workers, pp. 1-298, (2006)
9 Billett, Stephen Richard, Learning throughout working life: A relational interdependence between personal and social agency, British Journal of Educational Studies, 56, 1, pp. 39-58, (2008)
10 Developing Agentic Professionals Through Practice Based Pedagogies, (2009)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
18
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers