Article Gold Open Access 2020

Differences between adolescents who do and do not successfully complete their program within a non-residential alternative education facility

Children and Youth Services Review
Journal · Vol. 109 · Art. 104735
Abstract

In this retrospective longitudinal study we examined which characteristics of 114 Dutch adolescents, aged 12–18 years, and their environment, predicted (un)successful completion of a non-residential alternative educational program for adolescents with complex problems, who are at risk for school drop-out or residential placement. The adolescents received care and education in a non-residential alternative educational facility (School2Care) for a mean period of 9.6 months (SD = 5.5 months). 69% successfully completed the program, and 31% unsuccessfully completed the program, ending in residential placement or living at home without school attendance, work or internship. Case file analyses showed that younger age, disruptive behavior disorder and one-parent families predicted unsuccessful program completion. It should therefore be examined whether the alternative educational program can be improved to better meet the needs of younger adolescents, adolescents with disruptive behavior disorder, and from one-parent families. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

Author Keywords

Adolescents success Characteristics Alternative education

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Altra Education and Youth Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands, iHUB, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Research Institute of Child Development and Education, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Netherlands Youth Institute - NJI, Utrecht, Netherlands
Research Institute of Child Development and Education, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
iHUB, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Horizon Youth Care and Special Education, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 What Works Reducing Reoffending, (1995)
2 Andrews, Donald A., REHABILITATING CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY AND PRACTICE, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 1, pp. 39-55, (2010)
3 Andrews, Donald A., Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 1, pp. 19-52, (1990)
4 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (2000)
5 Carmody, Karen Appleyard, When more is not better: The role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomes, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 46, 3, pp. 235-245, (2005)
6 Towards A Typology of Alternative Education Programs A Compilation of Elements from the Literature, (2003)
7 Bevington, Dickon, Innovations in Practice: Adolescent Mentalization-Based Integrative Therapy (AMBIT) - a new integrated approach to working with the most hard to reach adolescents with severe complex mental health needs, Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18, 1, pp. 46-51, (2013)
8 School Community Journal, (2001)
9 A Meta Analysis of Dropout Prevention Outcomes and Strategies, (2015)
10 Daryanani, Issar, Single Mother Parenting and Adolescent Psychopathology, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 7, pp. 1411-1423, (2016)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
6
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers