Article Gold Open Access 2020

Undergraduate biological sciences and biotechnology students' reflective essays focus on descriptive details of experiential learning experiences

Advances in Physiology Education
Journal · Vol. 44 · Issue 1 · pp. 99-103
Abstract

Halpin PA, Donahue AE, Johnson KM. Undergraduate biological sciences and biotechnology students' reflective essays focus on descriptive details of experiential learning experiences. Adv Physiol Educ 44: 99-103, 2020; doi:10.1152/advan.00144.2019.-Experiential learning experiences (ELEs), opportunities for students to apply knowledge and skills critically in a hands-on environment, are fundamental to the apprenticeship model of biological and biotechnological sciences. ELEs enhance student-learning gains, increase career readiness, and provide important networking opportunities. However, students do not often recognize the benefits of ELEs. Reflection is a highly effective tool to articulate learning gains and connect new content with established knowledge. Therefore, senior undergraduate students (n β 23), majoring in biological sciences or biotechnology, wrote required reflective essays about their ELE, in response to an intentionally vague prompt. Qualitative assessment of the reflective essays identified themes present in the reflective essays that typically included descriptions of what students did, with whom they worked, and what they learned during their ELE, but lacked critical analysis or deep reflection about their experience. Differences were also present between different types of ELEs. These results provide a foundation for guiding students to deeper reflection, ultimately resulting in greater benefits from their ELEs. To promote more robust reflection, and, therefore, theoretically enhance learning gains from ELEs, we suggest multiple iterations of reflection, instructor feedback and coaching, and ELE-specific prompts that focus on the placement of ELEs within students' personal and professional trajectory. © 2020.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Experiential learning qualitative analysis Reflective essays Undergraduate STEM education

Index Keywords

female human male procedures psychology Humans Students student university Universities education Problem based learning Problem-Based Learning biotechnology biomedicine Biological Science Disciplines
Author Affiliations
Department of Life Science, University of New Hampshire Manchester, Manchester, NH, United States
Library Director, University of New Hampshire Manchester, Manchester, NH, United States
Department of Biology, Beloit College, Beloit, WI, United States, Trail Build, LLC, East Troy, WI, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
Grant: 1209189
This work was funded by the National Science Foundation University of New Hampshire ADVANCE Visiting Women Scholar Grant (Grant 1209189).
References 10 References
1 Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education A Call to Action, (2011)
2 Murrell, Patricia H., Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory: A Meta‐Model for Career Exploration, Journal of Counseling & Development, 66, 8, pp. 374-377, (1988)
3 Theories of Group Behavior, (1987)
4 How College Works, (2014)
5 Cliff, William H., Is formative assessment an effective way to improve learning? A symposium at Experimental Biology 2008, American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 32, 4, pp. 337-338, (2008)
6 Coker, Jeffrey Scott, Student motivations and perceptions across and within five forms of experiential learning, Journal of General Education, 65, 2, pp. 138-156, (2016)
7 Career and Technical Education Research, (2013)
8 Harvey, Marina, Towards a theory of the ecology of reflection: Reflective practice for experiential learning in higher education, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 13, 2, (2016)
9 Hatcher, Julie Adele, Reflection: Bridging the Gap between Service and Learning, College Teaching, 45, 4, pp. 153-158, (1997)
10 Developing Reflective Judgment Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults, (1994)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
3
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers