Article Green Open Access 2020

Retention strategies and interventions for health workers in rural and remote areas: A systematic review protocol

JBI Evidence Synthesis
Journal · Vol. 18 · Issue 1 · pp. 87-96
Abstract

Objective: The objective of the current review is to examine the association between exposure to strategies or interventions to retain health workers in rural and remote areas of high-income countries and improved retention rates. Introduction: Attracting and retaining sufficient healthcare staff to provide adequate services for residents of rural and remote areas is an international problem. High-income countries have specific challenges in staffing remote and rural areas; despite the majority of the population clustering in large cities, a significant number of communities are in rural, remote or frontier areas which may be perceived as less attractive locations in which to live and work. Inclusion criteria: The review will consider studies that include health workers in high-income countries where participants have been exposed to interventions, support measures or incentive programs to increase retention or workforce length of employment or reduce turnover for health workers in rural and remote areas. Analytical observational studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies, descriptive observational study designs, and descriptive cross-sectional studies published from 2010 will be eligible for inclusion. Methods: We will use the JBI methodology for reviews of risk and etiology. A range of databases will be searched. Two reviewers will screen, critically appraise eligible articles, and extract data from included studies. Data synthesis will be conducted, where feasible, with RevMan 5.3.5. A random effects model will be used to conduct meta-analyses. We will assess the certainty of the findings using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. © 2020 THE JOANNA BRIGGS INSTITUTE.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Health workforce Remote Rural retention Incentives

Index Keywords

Employment adult cross-sectional study female human male Cross-Sectional Studies Humans Systematic Review Article motivation controlled study Literature health care personnel Health Personnel health workforce meta analysis high income country personnel management data synthesis observational study Turnover rate incentive Observational Studies as Topic case control study Personnel Turnover Review Literature as Topic
Author Affiliations
Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Increasing Access to Health Workers in Remote and Rural Areas Through Improved Retention Global Policy Recommendations, (2010)
2 Report on the Audit of Health Workforce in Rural and Regional Australia, (2008)
3 Rural Remote Australians Internet, (2017)
4 Defining Rural Population, (2018)
5 Frontier and Remote Area Codes Internet, (2016)
6 Life in A Remote and or Isolated First Nations Community Internet, (2019)
7 Dolea, Carmen Mihaela, Evaluated strategies to increase attraction and retention of health workers in remote and rural areas, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 5, pp. 379-385, (2010)
8 Paliadelis, Penny S., The challenges confronting clinicians in rural acute care settings: a participatory research project., Rural and remote health, 12, (2012)
9 Buykx, Penny F., Systematic review of effective retention incentives for health workers in rural and remote areas: Towards evidence-based policy, Australian Journal of Rural Health, 18, 3, pp. 102-109, (2010)
10 Anton Breinl Centre for Public Health and Tropical Medicine, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
15
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers