Article 2019

Work-readiness integrated competence model: Conceptualisation and scale development

Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 61 · Issue 5 · pp. 568-589
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to conceptualise graduate work-readiness (GWR) and to develop a scale to measure it. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology entailed the compilation of a literature review and the conduct of qualitative interviews and a focus group to generate items. This study used the “resource-based view” approach to conceptualise a multi-dimensional–“work-readiness integrated competence model (WRICM)”–consisting of four main factors (namely, intellectual, personality, meta-skill and job-specific resources), with a further ten sub-dimensions. Further, a series of tests were performed to assess its reliability and validity. Findings: A final 53-item WRICM scale covering four dimensions and ten sub-dimensions of GWR was developed based on the perceptions of 362 HR professionals and managers from seven Asia-Pacific countries. The ten sub-dimensions covering 53 work-readiness skills reflect the perceptions of stakeholders regarding the work-readiness of graduates. The scale was found to be psychometrically sound for measuring GWR. Research limitations/implications: Though the WRICM model is based on the inputs of different stakeholders of GWR (employers, educators, policy makers and graduates), the development of the WRICM scale is based on the perspectives of industry/employers only. Practical implications: The WRICM model has implications for education, industry, professional associations, policy makers and for graduates. These stakeholders can adapt this scale in assessing the work-readiness of graduates in different streams of education. Originality/value: The authors believe that the WRICM model is the first multi-dimensional construct that is based on a sound theory and from the inputs from graduate work-readiness stakeholders from seven Asia-Pacific countries. © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Scale development Graduate work-readiness Work-readiness construct Work-readiness model Work-readiness scale

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Cardiff School of Management, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Department of Management Studies, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, UK, India
School of Management, Curtin Business School, Perth, WA, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Abdullah, Firdaus, The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30, 6, pp. 569-581, (2006)
2 Graduate Employability What do Employers Think and Want, (2008)
3 Stakeholder Perceptions of Chemical Engineering Graduate Attributes at the University of Adelaide, (2008)
4 Atlay, Mark T., An institutional approach to developing students' 'transferable' skills, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37, 1, pp. 76-84, (2000)
5 Barney, Jay Bryan, Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1, pp. 99-120, (1991)
6 Barrie, Simon C., Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates, Higher Education, 51, 2, pp. 215-241, (2006)
7 Bhaerman, Robert D., A dialogue on employability skills: How can they be taught?, Journal of Career Development, 15, 1, pp. 41-52, (1988)
8 Literacy and Numeracy Studies, (2010)
9 Black, Stephen, The literacy and numeracy ‘crisis’ in Australian workplaces: discursive rhetoric vs. production floor realities, Journal of Education and Work, 28, 6, pp. 607-630, (2015)
10 Bridgstock, Ruth, The graduate attributes we've overlooked: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills, Higher Education Research and Development, 28, 1, pp. 31-44, (2009)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
66
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers