Article 2019

How firms’ participation in apprenticeship training fosters knowledge diffusion and innovation

Journal of Business Economics
Journal · Vol. 89 · Issue 5 · pp. 569-597
Abstract

Previous studies typically relate apprenticeship training or more generally ‘Vocational Education and Training’ (VET) to training that is highly specific and that uses well-established technologies. Accordingly, apprenticeship training is typically not expected to have positive effects on innovation. In contrast, we argue in this paper that the type of dual apprenticeship training seen in Switzerland (or Germany and Austria) does create positive innovation effects due to the VET system’s built-in and institutionalized curriculum development and updating processes. These processes ensure that firms participating in apprenticeship training gain access to knowledge that is close to the innovation frontier and that ultimately fosters innovation. We provide theoretical explanations of how this knowledge diffusion works and how it can help to generate innovation. We use the Swiss VET system as one example and derive hypotheses about the relationship between firms’ participation in apprenticeship training and their innovation outcomes. Empirical analyses support our hypotheses. In a VET system with a built-in curriculum-updating process like the one in Switzerland (or Germany), firms participating in apprenticeship training have higher innovation outcomes than do non-participating firms. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Vocational education Apprenticeship training Innovation Knowledge diffusion

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Business Administration, Universität Zürich, Zurich, ZH, Switzerland
Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, Wuppertal, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, Jackstädt Center of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Research, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Aghion, Philippe, Higher education and innovation, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 9, SPEC. ISSUE, pp. 28-45, (2008)
2 Aghion, Philippe, Joseph Schumpeter lecture: Appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 2-3, pp. 269-314, (2006)
3 Aghion, Philippe, Competition and innovation: An inverted-u relationship, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 2, pp. 701-728, (2005)
4 Angrist, Joshua D., Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 4, pp. 69-85, (2001)
5 Betriebliche Bildungs Und Wettbewerbsstrategien Im Deutschbritischen Vergleich, (1996)
6 Backes-Gellner, Uschi, Reverse educational spillovers at the firm level, Evidence-based HRM, 5, 1, pp. 80-106, (2017)
7 75 Jahre Eidgenossisches Berufsbildungsgesetz, (2008)
8 Bolli, Thomas, Vertical educational diversity and innovation performance, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27, 2, pp. 107-131, (2018)
9 undefined, (2002)
10 Carlsson, Bo, On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 2, pp. 93-118, (1991)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
31
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers