Article 2019

Fostering self-efficacy and self-regulation in higher education: a matter of autonomy support or academic motivation?

Higher Education Research and Development
Journal · Vol. 38 · Issue 4 · pp. 733-747
Abstract

By implementing student-centred learning environments, higher education institutions aim to foster student self-efficacy and self-regulation. Previous research that focuses on how students perceive these learning environments usually does not take the differential impact of students’ study motivation into account. However, the type of motivation might influence how students perceive their learning environment. To this end, this study investigates the relationship between students’ perceived autonomy support in student-centred learning environments and self-regulation and self-efficacy by taking study motivation into account. The results indicate that autonomy-supportive teacher behaviour enhances self-efficacy for students who are autonomously motivated. Amotivated students might need other than autonomy-supportive teacher behaviour to develop self-efficacy. Self-regulation seems to play a less distinct role. Overall, when examining the effects of autonomy-supportive teaching in higher education, the quality and quantity of students’ motivation has a role to play, an aspect which is important to consider in future research and practice. © 2019, © 2019 HERDSA.

Keywords

Author Keywords

motivation Higher education self-efficacy Self-regulation autonomy support

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Training and Education Sciences, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, VAN, Belgium
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Alivernini, Fabio, Relationship between social context, self-efficacy, motivation, academic achievement, and intention to drop out of high school: A longitudinal study, Journal of Educational Research, 104, 4, pp. 241-252, (2011)
2 Baeten, Marlies, The effects of different learning environments on students' motivation for learning and their achievement, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 3, pp. 484-501, (2013)
3 Baker, Sarah Ruth, Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in University Adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance, Current Psychology, 23, 3, pp. 189-202, (2004)
4 Self Efficacy the Exercise of Control, (1997)
5 Teacher as Social Context A Measure of Student Perceptions of Teacher Provision of Involvement Structure and Autonomy Support, (1988)
6 Teaching for Quality Learning at University, (1999)
7 Black, Aaron E., The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective, Science Education, 84, 6, pp. 740-756, (2000)
8 Boekaerts, Monique, How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation?, Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3, pp. 199-210, (2006)
9 Boekaerts, Monique, Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention, Applied Psychology, 54, 2, pp. 199-231, (2005)
10 Active Learning Creating Excitement in the Classroom, (1991)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
91
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers