Article 2019

Cytotechnologists’ education and work in Finland

Cytopathology
Journal · Vol. 30 · Issue 3 · pp. 281-284
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to survey the work that cytotechnologists carry out in Finland. Methods: An electronic questionnaire was planned with the Board of the Finnish Association of Cytotechnologists and an email containing the link was sent to all 107 of its members in January 2018. It included 17 questions on their age and work experience, education and work. There was also space for them to add other comments. Results: Just under half (45%) replied. Their average age was 51 years (range 28-64), 41% had a Bachelor's degree, 59% had college-level training and they had spent an average of 15 years screening cytology specimens. After basic professional education, they had completed their cytology education in many ways and the most common routes were internship training (71%) and 1-year cytology specialisation (38%). Most of the cytotechnologists (85%) had duties other than screening and they mostly included a combination of histotechnology and cytotechnology (37.5%) or just cytotechnology (17%) or histotechnology (9%). The other 15% only screened cytology specimens. All cytotechnologists screened Papanicolaou smears, 94% screened urinary and respiratory specimens, 82% screened effusions and 39% screened fine-needle aspirations. Conclusions: We found that internship training provided essential training for Finnish cytotechnologists after they complete their basic professional studies. They reported many other duties in addition to microscopy screening. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Keywords

Author Keywords

education screening cytology cytotechnologist

Index Keywords

adult female human questionnaire Humans Surveys and Questionnaires Article Vocational education education human experiment middle aged Work experience specialization Finland e-mail respiratory system cytotechnologist fine needle aspiration biopsy microscopy Papanicolaou test urine clinical laboratory personnel cytodiagnosis mass screening vagina smear Biopsy, Fine-Needle Medical Laboratory Personnel Vaginal Smears
Author Affiliations
Biomedical Laboratory Science, Tampereen Ammattikorkeakoulu, Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Herbert, Amanda P., Training and practice of cytotechnologists: A discussion forum focused on Europe, Cytopathology, 25, 5, pp. 307-315, (2014)
2 Anić, Veronika, Survey of training and education of cytotechnologists in Europe, Cytopathology, 25, 5, pp. 302-306, (2014)
3 Tötsch, Martin, Education and training in cytology in Europe, Cytopathology, 27, 5, pp. 317-320, (2016)
4 Pajtler, Marija, Organisation of cervical cytology screening in Croatia: Past, present and future, Collegium Antropologicum, 31, SUPPL. 2, pp. 47-54, (2007)
5 Liikanen, Eeva, Finnish cytotechnologists' views on the competencies of newly graduated biomedical scientists in clinical cytology, Cytopathology, 29, 1, pp. 80-83, (2018)
6 Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs Caahep, (2013)
7 Savaloja, Lynnette C., Emerging education program assists cytotechnologists in a changing landscape, MLO: medical laboratory observer, 48, 3, (2016)
8 Donnelly, Amber D., The ‘Morph'ology of cytotechnology education, Cytopathology, 27, 5, pp. 310-312, (2016)
9 Stevens, Mark W., Continuing education for cytotechnologists: The Australian experience, Cytopathology, 11, 5, pp. 333-342, (2000)
10 Gill, B., Editorial: What should be done to improve cytopathology training in the UK?, Cytopathology, 21, 3, pp. 142-144, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers