Article Gold Open Access 2019

The practice of modularized curriculum in higher education institution: Active learning and continuous assessment in focus

Cogent Education
Journal · Vol. 6 · Issue 1 · Art. 1611052
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of modularization in Ethiopian higher education institutions with particular reference to the instructional process (active learning and continuous assessment). Mixed research design was employed. Three universities were focus of the study. Three hundred and eight undergraduate students and 144 instructors were selected using stratified and simple random sampling. Data were collected using questionnaire and semi-structured interview. The study found out that the instructional process in the modularized program is below the expectation. The teaching–learning process was found to be predominately teacher-centered and limited to PowerPoint presentations. Students were still found as an outsider in the process of knowledge construction playing a recipient role. It was also found that continuous assessment has continued to be perceived and practiced as continuous testing in which students sat for tests and quizzes frequently with no written and/or oral feedback. Large class size and shortage of time (i.e., nature of block teaching approach) have been found to be challenges for making the instructional process effective in helping the students achieve the objectives stipulated in the curriculums. Alternative teaching strategies that fit to large class size and further staff development activities that address misconceptions on active learning and continuous assessment were suggested. © 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Active learning modularization Instructional process continuous assessment

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Education, Dire Dawa University, Dire-Dawa, Ethiopia
National Chi Nan University, Puli, Nantou, Taiwan
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, (2016)
2 Asian Social Science, (2010)
3 Bennett, Randy Elliot, Formative assessment: A critical review, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 1, pp. 5-25, (2011)
4 Billing, David L., Review of modular implementation in a University, Higher Education Quarterly, 50, 1, pp. 1-21, (1996)
5 Black, Paul J., Developing the theory of formative assessment, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 1, pp. 5-31, (2009)
6 Assessment for Learning Putting It into Practice, (2003)
7 Active Learning Creating Excitement in the Classroom, (1991)
8 Broadfoot, Patricia M., Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11, 1, pp. 7-26, (2004)
9 Innovations in Education and Training International, (1995)
10 Carless, David Robert, Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 1, pp. 57-66, (2007)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
47
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers